|
Posted by Shambler on 2003/05/11 15:08:47 |
I thought a trio of themed threads about other entertainment media might be good. If you're not interested, please just ignore the thread and pick some threads that interest you from here: http://celephais.net/board/view_all_threads.php
Anyway, discuss films... |
|
|
There's Defnitely Funny Bits
#2281 posted by nitin on 2008/03/04 13:26:24
in the new one, just not consistent enough in my book. And I hated the marlon wayans character.
Catacmob? This one??
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0449471/
That's never likely to make it to oz cinemas, probably be a straight to dvd in a year or so :)
Yeah - I Think Thats The One...
#2282 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/04 13:52:22
...I dunno, the film had its many shortcomings, but lets just say it surprised me. Also the set was very cool. It would make a good Quake level! Infact it reminded me of Februus Depth or that Mike Woodham level that came out last year.
I dont want to spoil it for anybody. The plot itself is what surprised me.
Speaking of Marlon Wayans, have you ever seen Dont Be A Menace To Society When Drinking Your Juice In South Central? He was possibly better cast in that!
Oh Yeah
#2283 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/04 13:54:49
It came out to rent on DVD in England either this week or last week i think, so you might get it sooner than you think. I dont know how long you guys have to wait for DVD releases in Australia.
Actually Speaking Of Recent Horror
#2284 posted by nitin on 2008/03/04 14:08:45
anyone seen the newish french movie called Inside? I've heard good stuff about that one. The first hour of Haute Tension is still the best horror I've seen in the last few years (along with The Descent).
Hot Fuzz
#2285 posted by scar3crow on 2008/03/04 18:35:22
I watched this 4 times in 3 days... I loved that film so much, I found the whole lot of it hilarious, and in someways preferred the first portion of the movie just due to the humorous exchanges and facial expressions.
I also really really liked the music cues for some reason, I actually would like to own this movie, seeing as how I enjoyed it just as much the 4th time as the 1st. Need to see Shaun of the Dead.
Watched It Yesterday
#2286 posted by negke on 2008/03/04 18:47:45
I didn't fall asleep but I wasn't overly intrigued either. It's not nearly as funny as the other Pegg/Frost stuff. Felt too long. The action ending reminded me of the over-the-top imaginary gun fight in one episode of Spaced - they probably liked the idea so much that they had to repeat it with real guns.
Bah
#2287 posted by Spirit on 2008/03/18 20:58:41
Shoot Em Up
Weird potpourri of "comedy", "cool" and awesome.
The annoying "wawawaaaaawawawawawawaaaa" music in the shooting scenes almost made me switch off right after 5 minutes as it ruined the nice atmosphere (that the start had) completely. Nothing to watch two times.
Clive Owen would make a great Max Payne. :)
#2288 posted by Spirit on 2008/03/24 11:57:00
New movie from the maker of Pirate Baby's Cabana Battle Street Fight 2006
Kings of Power 4 Billion %
http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4096264
...
#2289 posted by starbuck on 2008/03/24 14:40:31
The Mist
Cheesy horror-ish film based on a Stephen King novella and starring the punisher guy (also known to maybe 4 or 5 people as Thomas Jane).
Somewhat surprising project choice for the director/producer of The Shawshank Redemption and the Green Mile, it's really quite a simple action/horror tale of a DEADLY MIST descending on a little town in bumfuck-ville USA. The film launches into the action really quickly and before long there's a load of folk stuck in a supermarket with a thick mist outside that may or may not be hiding frightening creatures (Spoiler: It is).
Most of the film is about the interactions of the people grouped together, and how people change when fear sets in. Specifically the film focuses on people being more susceptible to religious zealotry when they're scared, although I thought that whole theme grated a bit.
Most of the antagonism in the film is from other trapped people, either refusing to believe the situation, being unwilling to try to escape, or religious types trying to sacrifice people to the mist.
Punisher guy is a solid lead actor, and a pretty good action star, although I wish he'd work on his acting in the "screams of regret and guilt" department. Really awkward, that's all I'm saying.
The ending of the film differs from the book, but it was approved by King and it's actually very good, and although I could see it coming but I'm still impressed they actually went the way they did. Overall it's what you'd expect, maybe worth a 6/10 or so, not worth paying much for unless you specifically like the genre, but it's a pretty good ride, don't worry about doing any heavy thinking (or being very scared to be honest).
Also it stars the Shermanator.
Serpico, 1973 Or So
#2290 posted by bambuz on 2008/03/25 22:26:32
Well. There's the seventies grit, crime and police testosterone but there's some warmth too. There's Al Pacino who in the beginning feels, or at least felt to me, like he's just Al Pacino again but the magic starts working. Perfect casting.
After watching this, it's easy to recognize they don't make movies for adults anymore.
This was based on a novel and directed by Sidney Lumet. A friend of mine recommended.
I recommend to people who have some patience to watch it. It's a good movie.
Porco Rosso, 1990 Or So
#2291 posted by bambuz on 2008/03/25 22:40:29
Another Ghibli masterpiece. They are ambitious and go the extra mile. A right kind of mix of fantasy and detailed realism. I'd explain more but I'd just spoil, well I can give one example: the throttle rod in the piston engined aircraft has a locking lever that has to be pushed so the lever moves. This is shown. I can't imagine anyone but the Japanese actually having the work ethic and appreciation of the viewer to do this. Or just having and showing the appreciation and wonder of free flight, in a way that's not extremely dumbed.
To mention technical things, there are a few places with nice 3 D changes of view, some drawn with high count of frames that is just so pleasing to the eye. Although there are a couple of places where they've skimped on the animation like sometimes in level cruise flight where the same plane slide without attitude animation is just moved linearly above the background.
But overall, a damn inspiring film, in so many ways. The environments and the actions and the motivations are just so fascinating and right and the whole atmosphere is pure beauty, magic and awesome. The hero is perhaps the most symphatetic ever.
Of course, most people think cartoons are for kids only. Judging from the ads too.
I don't go to movies anymore, I've sworn enough times after lousy waste of time...
This was using a ticket I had had since last summer that was going to expire in April. The old Ghibli stuff is the only worthwhile thing, it's a good idea that they show them in major theaters nowadays. Totoro was the rerun last year, and they've shown the newer stuff too.
Screamers
#2292 posted by Spirit on 2008/03/27 21:54:03
Screamers (1995)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114367/
Cheesy clichee dialogs, some not so great actors, awesome environmentals and buildings, nice dark soundtrack, nice story (based on a book by Philip K. Dick, guess I will read that). The start is rather weak and cheap, it gets much better when they are "showing less" and the story sinks in. For me the ending ruined the good impression of the second half again though, like so often.
The environments alone are worth watch this if you like post-nuclear dystopian snowy AWESOMENESS.
http://www.quaddicted.com/stuff/screamers.jpg
Oooh
#2293 posted by DaZ on 2008/03/28 02:51:15
Screenshot looks interesting, I will have to have a look at that!
30 Days Of Night
#2294 posted by megaman on 2008/03/28 14:53:17
what's it with these shitty scripts & creature designs lately?
http://img258.imageshack.us/my.php?image=daysnightsye3.jpg i loled
Also, the director eneds to learn about subtlety, cutting and making your actors use some other expression than "blank stare" or "evile stare" :(
Serpico Rocks
#2295 posted by nitin on 2008/03/30 06:47:54
check out luet's other stuff if you liked thta, Dog Day Afternoon and Network.
Yea
#2296 posted by bambuz on 2008/03/30 20:16:25
I've seen Failsafe (however you spell it). Twice actually.
The same friend originally recommended Dog Day Afternoon and Serpico. So that's on my list.
Some Stuff I Saw Before I Went Away
#2297 posted by nitin on 2008/04/02 13:05:39
The Winslow Boy (1999) - pretty effective period piece from David Mamet about a famous old english legal case (essentially a variation on the david v goliath theme).
Its fairly predictable plot wise but the writing is good, the acting is good and it interestingly makes some of the big scenes in this type of movie (ie trial etc) happen off screen with the focus on the consequences and effects ont he characters.
6.5/10
Fists in the Pocket (1965) - Quite an impressive look at a young mind that is slowly but surely disintegrating.
Filled with anger and tortured by frustration at having family members that are either physically or mentally incapacitated, the main character in Mario Bellochio's debut film resorts to the only way he sees out - to get rid of them all.
It's a dark and disturbing look at the downward spiral of a young outcast epilectic's sanity and is aided by a tremendous performance by Lou Castel in the main role.
Ultimately though, the singular one note nature of the film renders it a very dour and downbeat affair.
7/10
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford - I was quite disappointed by Andrew Dominik's meditation on celebrity and identity in the form of a western.
It's a pity because its beautifully shot and scored, has two excellent performances by Casey Affleck and Brad Pitt and the last 30 min or so, plus two dinner table conversations in the middle of the film, are great cinema.
But the rest of it is unfortunately very disjointed and unfocused, resulting in an overdrawn and muddled movie that never meets its ambitions.
5.5/10
Lust Caution - Before going away I made some comments about Black Book, an exciting, fun but substanceless action blockbuster from Paul Verhoeven. This has almost exactly the same general plot but Ang Lee's movie is a more complex, layered, subtle, spectacular and also frustrating work.
The movie is set in japanese occupied China during WWII and focuses on the actions of a resistance group, particularly those of a young, naive girl played spectacularly by newcomer Tang Wei. The relationship between her and Tony Leung's character, an officer in the chinese collaboration, forms the centre of the film.
The acting and writing are of a very high quality, the look and mood is perfect and the plot compelling.
However, the pacing does leave a lot to be desired which is a shame because it would have otherwise made this excellent film into a great one.
7.5/10
White Heat (1949) - tightly written and acted old fashioned gangster film with an intrgiuing mother-son relationship at its core.
The relationship between James Cagney's gangster boss and his 'Ma' turns what would have been well made but routine fare into something a lot more impressive and also allows the scrip to come with some memorable and quotable dialogue.
7.5/10
#2298 posted by Spirit on 2008/04/05 00:12:47
Run, Fat Boy, Run (2007)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0425413/
A generic clichee boring funny long tragecomedy (is that word used in english too?) that not even Simon Pegg can rescue from mediocrity. Not bad, not good, just non-exciting popcorn movie with some good laughs.
Death Proof
#2299 posted by Spirit on 2008/04/07 22:47:47
What a piece of shit. Well deserved being a flop in cinema (no idea about Planet Terror, that one is prolly much better). It's boring, the story is stupid, the "omg old movie effect" effects are bad, the girls are ugly, Tarantino is a massive wanker or what? Does he think if he, the god, makes a bad movie it automatically becomes good? Bah, big disappointment.
Tarantino
#2300 posted by DaZ on 2008/04/07 22:57:13
everything after Pulp Fiction has been a let down.
Step Up 2: The Streets
#2301 posted by starbuck on 2008/04/08 01:20:25
A tour de france! Even better than the first film, showcasing a realistic interpretation of the turmoil and gritty reality of life on the streets while dancing to average hip hop in slow-motion. The screenwriters cleverly decided to only use lines of dialogue that had previously appeared more than a dozen times in other films, in a satire on the mainstream nature of modern pop culture. This also allowed the focus of the viewer to remain firmly on the slow motion dancing, and trying to ignore the racist undertones which underpin most of the scenes.
OH DEAR/10
#2302 posted by rj on 2008/04/08 09:03:41
i saw cloverfield the other night
it could have been a very average godzilla-esque monster flick, but the blair witch style filming made it enjoyable. some very tense moments & good overall atmosphere, even if some of the characters were a little annoying
Death Proof
#2303 posted by nitin on 2008/04/08 11:48:49
I quite liked the first half but found the second half to be trash.
Shortish reviews of some that I saw on the weekend plus one last night :
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead - easily Sidney Lumet's best film in 25 years (after all his last one was a courtroom 'comedy' starring Vin Diesel) but while it's a return to form, it falls short of the great stuff he made during the 70's.
It�s a well made but predictable movie with good acting, good writing and a permeating mood of despair throughout. Philip Seymour Hoffman continues to demonstrate that he can pretty much do anything and he gets good support from Albert Finney and Marisa Tomei (and to a lesser extent Ethan Hawke who tends to overact everything but is still effective).
7-7.5/10
Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) - the fourth great film from Woody Allen and I really can�t fault it despite the score I give it. Everything works, the ensemble cast of Michael Caine, Mia Farrow, Barbara Hershey, Dianne Weist, Max Von Sydow and Allen himself is perfect, the writing and characterisations are of a very high standard, there's no scene that is out of place and it ends well.
8/10
Mirror (1975) - probably Andrei Tarkovsky's most difficult film, and that's a big statement in itself, this autobiographical version of his life requires you to know a fair bit about Tarkovsky himself and/or russian history to fully appreciate it. Its no normal biopic though, it�s the film equivalent of the stream of consciousness technique in writing with no concept of time and space and pretty much a visual depiction of how memory is, a collection of events from different periods that seem to segue into each other over time.
But even if you don�t fully understand it, and I certainly didn�t, it's quite easy to appreciate the filmmaking skill on display. Most of the individual segments work well on their own and as is usual with Tarkovsky, the imagery is hypnotic.
6/10
In the Valley of Elah - Tommy Lee Jones seems to be recently perfecting the character of the disillusioned and bitter old man and his work here is probably the best incarnation of that character.
Paul Haggis' iraq themed film suffers from his usual heavy handed and contrived writing but is rescued by the performances of Jones and Charlize Theron in the main roles and by the camerawork of the great Roger Deakins.
7/10
Cloverfield
#2304 posted by nitin on 2008/04/08 11:49:30
is it true the camerawork here is more vomit inducing thann in the recent bourne films?
#2305 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/04/08 13:12:05
Cloverfield is fucking awesome. End of story.
It's shot via camcorder so if you easily get motion sick, you might not like it. But the thing is, it needs to be shot that way to work. The shots of the monster are so pants tightening it overrides my desire to complain about the camera work.
|
|
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
|
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.
|
|