Deleting: nope
Editing: nope
HTH.
#2171 posted by
Kinn on 2017/03/07 00:16:58
If this hypothetical edit function is to be used for legit purposes, (fixing typos, bad links) and not just for shitposting reasons, then the edit window should be small - 1 hour seems too generous.
Thing is, I don't really see the point of this when you can just use the already existing "post preview" feature. If posts are still full of errors after you've previewed it, you're just sloppy and deserve to have your stupidly written in stone for all eternity.
#2172 posted by
PRITCHARD on 2017/03/07 01:21:10
Moderators can edit posts. Why not just let them do it if it realy has to be done?
No We Can't.
#2173 posted by
Shambler on 2017/03/07 10:36:26
Only the initial topic posts.
+1 for editing within a short time frame. Nuff double posts and broken HTML etc.
#2174 posted by
Rick on 2017/03/07 14:52:22
Time limited edit should be available, but no deleting.
The preview works if you remember to use it. If there was an option to post only after at least one mandatory preview, I would use it.
Lifes too short to use preview!
Also theres legit reasons to have an edit and delete. I'd use it to delete my own weird spam (like triple posts) and edit out typos.
This whole "etched in stone" business is just daft.
#2178 posted by
muk on 2017/03/09 20:32:13
~30 minute window to edit posts sounds fair to me.
Easier to make some sort of client-side throttle that blocks accidental posts.
#2180 posted by
PRITCHARD on 2017/03/10 01:11:43
Force Preview In Posts With Links
#2181 posted by
adib on 2017/03/12 15:58:52
If you wanna post links, you'll have to preview them. And since you're there anyway, please click them to check if they work. If you had to preview your links and still screwed up, well...
Pure text posts wouldn't require preview.
That would be enough. No need to edit. And triple post detection should be on the site (or not).
Brainfart
#2182 posted by
DaZ on 2017/04/06 23:47:24
what if when you put the post #number in the title of your post it creates a link to that post.
*Disappears in the puff of ideas guy smoke*
#2183 posted by
metlslime on 2017/04/07 08:59:39
i actually have that on my todo list too :)
#2183
This would be super handy. Hope it appears when you have the time.
Bump
#2185 posted by
Shambler on 2017/04/10 10:51:59
For the Coding Help stickification massive.
While I'm At It.
#2186 posted by
Shambler on 2017/04/10 10:53:09
I would still really like to see a neat round number of 10 perma-threads. 4 additions needed:
Coding Help
Engine Discussion
Other PC Games
<what goes here?>
#2189 posted by
khreathor on 2017/04/10 13:30:22
Or in overall Compilation/Lighting thread.
Afaik OTP wanted to do something like that.
+1 Tyrutils-ericw
#2190 posted by
mjb on 2017/04/10 14:53:14
Also for some sort of lighting help thread/tips thread.
#2191 posted by
PRITCHARD on 2017/04/10 16:32:58
Not really sure why people want to pin more threads. If anything, I think we should reduce them. Jobs & Mappers Wanted would be fine as a standard thread with the level of attention it gets.
Errr Cos It Makes It More User Friendly??
#2192 posted by
Shambler on 2017/04/10 16:45:50
Easier to find relevant threads.
Sticky "The Pillaging Of CZG's Anus"
#2193 posted by
negke on 2017/04/13 00:58:31
IMO none of the threads mentioned warrant being stickied, because they are either used too rarely or being bumped frequently enough to appear on the main list. Possibly something like a 'best of' list/thread with links to the most important (whatever that means) non-permanent threads.