 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
I can loan you a PS4 controller to test. I have two and we rarely play split screen. Since we're in the US. Shipping would be no big deal if using ground. LMK.
Ericw I'd offer but IIRC customs is a drag on your end right - or has that changed? Thanks for the thought, yeah, shipping + customs would probably be cost prohibitive; I was thinking of getting one since they seem like a nice controller.
I could send you a 3rd party controller if you like. It's a GameSir. Switches between dinput, xinput and iOS. Wireless with a dongle... Lemme know. I'm in sunny Scotland. :)
Yeah, that's the one. I use it on my PS3 which I only have around for Xevious Resurrection!
For the money, it really is pretty good. Nice and sturdy. :) @dumptruck_ds - I should be able to get my hands on one.
@ericw - Yeah, more or less at some point I'm going to do pretty much what SDL2 does Download: Windows - Direct X | WinQuake
Revisions: 1) Eliminating a config reading issue (johnnylaw) 2) Must add -joystick to command line to enable Xbox controller support The adding -joystick to avoid false axis interaction with non-Xbox controllers. Some time in the future, I'll extend the implementation of controller support to an SDL2 level where it detects and remaps a quantity of known controllers. ---- Alternate extra builds which are provided for experimentation purposes or have been specifically requested: Extra builds Updated the downloads/installer on:
http://quakeone.com/markv Empty queue of existing issues, I think this build classifies as "rock solid". (Always more features to do Congratulations! I've just been playing Quoth on a laptop at 4k. A bit choppy here and there but it's an Intel HD 5500 so I don't think it's 1099. Glad you updated the website. I was going to nudge you a bit on that!
Now I can do that video! How is the default contrast value of 2 looking for people? It seemed ok running in a Windows VM on my Macbook, but on my desktop I had to crank it down to a value of 1.
My mistake, it was also 1 in the VM too. Not sure how that happened since 2 is the default; maybe the previous build had a different default?
The contrast default wasn't supposed to be changed. I may have been comparing different values between the hardware and software renderers.
I'll reupload. So is this build now fully capable of running latest version of Arcane Dimensions or some limits still need to be raised?
I was able to play Sepulcher on the first build of 1099. I have not attempted Ter Sheboleth yet. That would be the real ball buster, even compared to Sepulcher.
@NightFright/dumptruck_ds
Didn't feel like posting a technical post Eventually I will implement a big coordinates protocol (for maps like Ter Shobelth) like FTE-999, which takes the weaknesses of protocol 999 and fixes them. I wouldn't be able to implement the very flawed and incomplete protocol 999, which cannot do co-operative play at all, because it would gross me out too much and I'd feel like vomiting. Co-operative play is important. Any "big coordinates" protocol must be one that do co-operative play. And 999 sure cannot, but FTE999 sure can. A large maps protocol like FTE-999 is on the to-do list. A 2019 item. But I also want prediction, framerate independence and something else I want which is boring and technical. /End snooze fest technical post If you do a co-operative game, do you want to
1) Be killed by invisible monsters? 2) Be killed by vore balls you can't see? That is what broken protocol 999 will offer you in co-operative play. It also has "scale", which doesn't work on 2/3 of entity types (.bsp, sprites) and also doesn't work right on the other 1/3 of entities (.mdl) and would result in Ogre feet in the floor and bad collision. So it is just loaded to brim with the brokesters upon more brokesters. Wanting large-coordinates is a valid thing! And those needs will be met in the future, but more in a FTE-999 manner that doesn't offer invisible monsters and being killed by vore-balls you cannot see. I'll go through and retest everything I've reported in the past....
First thing I checked: Looks like unpacked pak files now work. Hey, Proquake 4.93 seems to have nicely-populated server browser (finds 36 servers).... Mark V only shows like 5 servers. How about reading Proquake's protocol to help populate your server list? lenovo e480 win10-64
intel uhd 620 latest drivers dxdiag seems good, still no dx seems to be present, all versions of dx-mark5 prompt an error, even older ones from 2016. Good news is the last gcc version does run fine, nno errors seen while playing +5hrs. Older versions/Win7 does work all of time by now. Tested 1.99 on various hardware btw, all fine. Congrats Baker! Get DX9 runtime here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-ie/download/details.aspx?id=35
all versions of dx-mark5 prompt an error
You know, I really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, HATE it when people do this. At least you could say what the error message was. Those things don't exist for bamboozlement or amusement, you know. They exist to provide useful information on how the error might be fixed. Saying what the error message was can enable people to say things like "ah, you got that error message, that's caused by situations A, B, C, and to fix it all you need to do is X, Y, Z"
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |