#20770 posted by necros on 2011/09/14 18:56:03
ohh yes, love the off-axis corridors and strong use of trims.
is that with the new format?
anyway, technical specs of the bsp2 sound quite amazing. it'll suck being tethered to the rmq engine for a while, but it's good that it's a fully different format so adding it to new engines won't be a hassle.
no hint though? is that still not possible?
good work, mh, sounds exciting!
Append
#20771 posted by necros on 2011/09/14 18:59:53
so what are the new limits? hopefully they are stupidly high so we never run into them again! :D
but yeah, even just doubling the old 64k hard limits would be quite awesome.
#20772 posted by gb on 2011/09/14 19:34:54
The elder world thing is just a tiny testmap, no BSP2 needed.
Lord MH will probably supply the details about the limits.
I also hope that other engines support the format.
This Made Me Laugh
#20773 posted by Zwiffle on 2011/09/14 23:40:48
Lol @ Zwiffle
#20774 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/09/14 23:56:18
Brilliant!
Also - Limits - I think that the main limits (of Fitz .85 etc) are 655## marksurfaces and vertexes. By that, I mean that those are the limits which you are likely to hit with a huge and very detailed map. MH has supposedly doubled those limits (consider the largest map you can think of, possibly the Warp 'city' map (with 666 monsters) or huge maps like Marcher etc. Well now we can have maps which are twice that size. As in 131### vertexes.
AGLQuake would run maps which are compiled and have more than 65K verts, but you would find giant moving polygons flickering through the whole map, and the clipping would be all b0rked.
This is because (in my simplified terms) that the actual BSP format itself has these limits, rather than the problem being that the engine wont run them.
I wonder if AGLQuake will run BSP2 maps......
Nope, It Doesnt.
#20775 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/09/14 23:59:26
First time I've had a map crash AGLQuake, lol.
#20776 posted by necros on 2011/09/15 01:59:24
hopefully mh swings by and clarifies more. :)
Is It Really Spam If It Is Indistinguishable From A Real Post
#20779 posted by anonymous user on 2011/09/15 08:39:42
Yes
#20780 posted by Zwiffle on 2011/09/15 16:45:45
The Elder Thing
#20781 posted by Shambler on 2011/09/16 12:02:11
Very pretty.
Also no racist cos that is probably a hugely fake-tanned white guy.
Random Question Time
#20782 posted by nitin on 2011/09/19 06:28:34
anyone on func done Everest Base Camp?
Have done some research but would be good to get some first hand info :)
Never Done It
#20783 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/09/19 13:13:32
But I have seen Everest Beyond The Limit.
Your F@cking mad, mate :)
http://wendybooker.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/everestcampsmap.jpeg
As you can see from the above image, Everest Base Camp (the first one) is at 17'000 feet. I have never been much higer than 3000 feet (without a preasurised cabin), and that was enough to give me a headache. Also, AFAIK, it takes atleast a month to get to Everest base camp.
Ricky
#20784 posted by nitin on 2011/09/19 14:01:04
I'm looking at a 17 day trek (which has a few acclimatisation days).
Previously been as high as 4200m during the Inca Trail but this will be another 1300m on top of that so the thin air is going to really kick in.
So In Other Words
#20785 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/09/19 14:17:41
You ARE a crazy person! ;)
To be honest, I can see the attraction of trekking round the Himalayas, or the Andes. Just for the beauty and the atmosphere of the experience.
Just Dont Get Summit Fever!!
#20786 posted by RickyT33 on 2011/09/19 14:20:02
Romero
#20787 posted by Zwiffle on 2011/09/19 20:41:58
Nitin
#20788 posted by Vigil on 2011/09/19 21:42:55
I think voodoochopsticks has been trekking in Nepal, though it might've been closer to Annapurna.
I wasn't (that) close to Everest, but did I visit Nepal this June, so if you have any questions, shoot.
Vigil
#20789 posted by nitin on 2011/09/20 04:05:20
I just had some about the trek itself rather than Nepal. thanks for the offer though.
Is VC on a current trek or did he do it before?
I Know A Few People Who've Been To Everest Base Camp
#20790 posted by mwh on 2011/09/20 04:31:34
It's a big deal, but not that big a deal, if that makes any sense. People rave about the scenery for sure. What sort of thing did you actually want to know? :)
Mwh
#20791 posted by nitin on 2011/09/20 04:34:39
just difficulty level, type of trail etc
Amazing Article.
#20793 posted by Shambler on 2011/09/20 10:44:55
Can't say I actually read it tho.
But Shambler
#20794 posted by neggers on 2011/09/20 11:11:39
A bigger penis allows for more mutilation! Shouldn't that make it interesting for you???
|