|
Posted by Shambler on 2003/05/11 15:08:47 |
I thought a trio of themed threads about other entertainment media might be good. If you're not interested, please just ignore the thread and pick some threads that interest you from here: http://celephais.net/board/view_all_threads.php
Anyway, discuss films... |
|
|
Bold Is A Bit Too Bold
#2016 posted by HeadThump on 2007/09/15 09:10:28
wanted to make the Simpsons quote stand out from the first quote, but it looks like I'm yelling in that section.
Live and Learn.
#2017 posted by metlslime on 2007/09/15 20:48:46
good guys and bad guys who wore intricate shades of gray
He's talking about their clothing.
Hmmm Could Be,
#2018 posted by HeadThump on 2007/09/15 22:17:40
though,in this shot I see Quake-ish shades of brown and tan, though this shot doesn't show the villain gang.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/graphics/2007/09/14/bfyuma114.jpg
And if they are dressed in gray with a bold flash of white and black on the trim (like a nifty scarf that would look gay on anyone but Steve McQueen), I guess I would owe mister Hollywood Reporter critic an apology.
^
#2019 posted by Spirit on 2007/09/16 00:59:28
What movie is that shot from? The last posts here are way too confusing for me to tell.
3:10 To Yuma
#2020 posted by HeadThump on 2007/09/16 03:09:57
is the title. It came out last week. I have many complaints about the screenplay, but strong performances from several actors including the two leads, Russell Crowe and Christian Bale made it worth seeing.
Here is a trailer to wet the appetite:
http://www.beyondhollywood.com/movie-trailer-russell-crowe-and-christian-bales-310-to-yuma/
3:10 To Yuma Looks Good
#2021 posted by nitin on 2007/09/17 04:53:09
as does Eastern Promises and Bourne Ultimatum.
I saw spidey3 on a plane, not the best way to see it but I could still see that the action scenes were awesome and the rest of the movie too long.
6.5-7/10
'spidey3 On A Plane' Sounds Like A Great Film.
#2022 posted by Text_Fish on 2007/09/17 10:35:14
"I'VE HAD IT WITH THESE MOTHER FUCKIN' SPIDERMEN ON THIS MOTHER FUCKIN' PLANE!"
Finally Had Time To Sit And Watch Stuff Properly
#2023 posted by nitin on 2007/09/23 03:18:39
Spiderman 3 - plane impressions were pretty much right. Too long, too convoluted and with too many characters. But there are some great scenes and the action is fantastically shot, a rarity these days IMHO, and Thomas Hayden Church makes a good Sandman. Topher Grace is not so good (then again the whole Venom character looks out of place).
Same issues as before with Maguire and Dunst who vary wildly in quality from scene to scene but, on the whole, this was decent enough.
6.5/10
13 Tzameti (2005) - A twistedly cruel little french thriller that is extremely well made despite the thinness of the material. Gela Babluani's film is at its best in the first 30 min or so when the movie is simply oozing with tension and atmosphere as a poor young carpenter follows instructions meant for someone else in the hope for money.
Where it ends up after that is not as interesting but you still have to admire Babluani's skill at keeping things extremely tense for the entire duration, aided by some very precise and skilful camerawork and some excellent sound design. There are scenes in here that will literally make you squirm, and not because of gore but out of sheer anticipation.
Hollywood remake on the way too.
7/10
The Woman in the Window (1944) - Fritz Lang's well directed and acted film goes along beautifully for about 90 min or so, despite what seems to be odd logic gaps and bizzarre occurrences. Then it gets short cicruited by an ending that is very logical but also very undermining of the material.
Till then though, it's an atmospheric noir piece with Edward G Robinson turning in a very good performance and Lang in control of his material.
6.5/10
The Grapes of Wrath (1940) - I have never really warmed to John Ford's output but this is one of the great american films. It is surprisingly directed with minimum sentimentality by Ford, which is strange given how prone the material (John Steinbeck's original novel) would have been to such an approach.
There is still some unnecessary comedy sequences but they are kept near the start, and for the most part it is an exquisitely shot, written and acted piece. This is pretty much as good as cinematography gets and it is used to great effect to highlight the impact of every scene.
Henry Fonda is pivotally great in the central role of Tom Joad and he gets some very good support from John Carradine and Jane Darwell.
There is also a bit of abruptness about the ending but, overall, there is not much wrong with it.
8.5/10
Day Watch (Dnevnoy Dozor)
#2024 posted by negke on 2007/09/23 10:27:41
Seriously, what was going on there? So many different things and ideas randomly thrown together...
Either I'm just to blunt to get the gist of it, or this is a good example of vodka-affected scriptwriting.
No Nescafe this time. ;)
#2025 posted by nitin on 2007/09/23 10:33:09
the's the exact same reaction I had to Night Watch, the prequel.
I'm Glad Not Everyone Loved Those Films
#2026 posted by starbuck on 2007/09/23 10:43:05
I thought nightwatch was just standard mishmash wannabe-badass generic balls, but most people think it's great... I get the feeling people think it's got some extra level of depth they should be appreciating because it's Russian trash as opposed to American or British trash.
#2027 posted by nitin on 2007/09/23 11:04:39
i hated night watch with a passion :)
Yeah
#2028 posted by negke on 2007/09/23 11:31:51
Though this one easily surpasses Night Watch by far. The theme had some potential but it wasn't properly executed. I usually like strange movies (or elements within movies) but there has to be at least some coherence.
Warrior King
#2029 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/09/27 17:24:23
I seem to be the only person I know who watched that film and decided it was the best kung-fu movie I have ever seen. Im even willing to say its THE best kung-fu movie ever made. Tony Jaa (or whatever hes called) IS Bruce Lee. If you havent seen it, watch it, and agree. Or if you can honestly tell me that you've seen a better film that I haven't then I'm dieing to know what it is!
B-movies!
#2030 posted by Spirit on 2007/09/27 20:48:26
I discovered the awesome http://cinemageddon.org/ recently (torrent site, but should be quite safe for its content). It's all about B-Movies and alike.
The first movie I watched from there was
For Y'ur Height Only
http://imdb.com/title/tt0200642/
http://www.youtube.com/v/M5KeUMxyAwM
http://www.youtube.com/v/eqh5O9LbjhY (so catchy!)
Mr. Giant has kidnapped the brilliant Dr. Van Kohler and is planning to use the Doctor's invention, the N-bomb, to hold the world hostage. The only one who can foil Mr. Giant's evil scheme is Agent 00, a 3-foot-tall filipino martial arts master, expert marksman, top-class romancer and all-around superspy. Can Agent 00 rescue Dr. Kohler before it's too late?
It's as awesome as it sounds. Really bad and really awesome. I am looking forward seeing the sequel.
Next was Hardware I think, I posted #1981
Now I just watched Warlords of the 21st Century
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084887/
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a91/Metalian/movies1/1-2.jpg
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a91/Metalian/movies1/2-1.jpg
It was so-so. Some good acting, some great effects (explosions!), some cool dialogs. The story was very kitschy and shallow though. Not nearly as great as I hoped after seeing the pictures. The truck is damn cool for sure and some other vehicle later too. The "good guy" is too much of a smug(?) to like him, but the bad guys are great.
Havent Seen Warrior King
#2031 posted by nitin on 2007/09/28 00:15:32
but saw bits of The Protector and thought that it was nowhere near as good as Ong Bak in the action scenes. Everything looked and felt more slicker, less intense, and PG. Probably the effect of a hollywood backing and a bigger budget.
So You Havent Seen Warrior King Yet Then?
#2032 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/09/28 10:50:13
Find it, watch it. I saw Ong Bak, and thought it was OK. In warrior king, I would like to add, there are no stunt-doubles, no wires, and no computer effects, except for in a couple of dreams that he has about elephants!
Really, you just re-itterated my point.
Also, I know a few people who say that they wouldnt watch it because it has sub titles. AAAAARRRRGGHH! Its a kung-fu movie, for goodness sake! You let your fists do all the talkin. Some of the best films I have ever seen had sub titles anyway. City of God?
Besides, Warrior King is half in english anyway, cause its mostly set in Sydney. Its a lot more grander and action packed than Ong Bak. Watch it people.
Looked It Up
#2033 posted by nitin on 2007/09/28 11:16:02
actually The Protector and The Warrior King are the same movie, different tilte for different regions.
Anyway, I stand by my comments. I thought the action scenes were much poorer than ong bak in this. Personal taste I guess, but that's what I think.
No point talking about the rest of it really, because that's all there is to it.
Yeah
#2034 posted by bal on 2007/09/28 11:27:34
I thought Ong Bak was better too... Even though if I remember correctly, that scenes in Honour of the Dragon (aka The Protector, aka Warrior King, hehe) where he's going up the different floors in the restaurant is quite impressive, as it's all done in one take. The flashback with the elephant at the end was pretty lol. =)
What About The Bit..
#2035 posted by RickyT33 on 2007/09/28 11:49:30
where he fights all of thos sk8er bois in the warehouse near the start? Theres a bit where he does a Neo-style backflip of a pane of glass which gets smashed up straight afterwards (all in slo mo), stuck in my mind. Ong bak just didnt romance me in the same way as Warrior King (or whatever you want to call it), the purity of the plot (WHERES MY ELEPHANT!!!) is fantastic. Much smaller body count in Ong Bak.
Also liked Unleashed. The moves in Warrior King were better though I guess.
Its like;
Enter the Dragon or Way of the Dragon?
#2036 posted by nitin on 2007/09/28 15:34:43
The Crying Game (1992) - well, I don�t really know what I actually thought of this as a whole to be honest. I found the first act which deals with the kidnapping of a british soldier by the IRA and the eventual bond that forms between one of the captors and the hostage to be poorly written, unconvincing and lazily made. Then the movie makes a complete right turn (and if you've seen it, you'll know what I'm talking about), becomes far more interesting with its characters, and the level of scripting improves drastically.
Its easily the strongest section of the film thanks to the acting and writing, which excels in its dialogue despite issues with pacing and flow. And then all of the good work is again undermined when the movie brings back the IRA subplot towards the end, leading to a very mundane and by the numbers conclusion.
There's definitely good stuff in here, it's just bookended with unconvincing material.
6.5/10
Du Levande
#2037 posted by bear on 2007/09/28 15:35:40
http://imdb.com/title/tt0445336/
The latest movie from Swedish film maker Roy Andersson who makes movies his own way even if it means he has to take breaks in the production to do commercials in order to fund his projects.
It's very different from pretty much everything being shown on cinema today and I strongly recommend you go see it if you get the opportunity (I know it has some international distribution but I have no idea to what extent).
#2038 posted by nitin on 2007/09/29 03:49:48
300 - well I know a lot of people liked this but I thought it was an absolute disgrace of a movie. A complete and utter waste of time from start to finish.
Even the much touted style didnt impress, I thought it looked average at best and, quite frequently, just plain awful.
1/10
Whew That's Harsh
#2039 posted by HeadThump on 2007/09/29 04:57:06
If you go in expecting a serious swords and sandals drama like Ben Hur or Gladiator and you get this movie instead I can see nailing it with a low score, but if your expectations are no more than you are going in to see a live action cartoon like the latest Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles than a more middle of the road rating would seem more appropriate in my humble estimation.
Expectations Were Low
#2040 posted by nitin on 2007/09/29 05:58:49
but I just didnt like the 'style'. It looked shit IMHO and the action scenes were also pretty ordinary except maybe one or two.
|
|
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
|
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.
|
|