#1971 posted by Kinn on 2016/01/20 17:56:00
Quark is the Jimmy Saville of Quake editors; it has ostensibly violated every map it has come into contact with, it is quite clearly dead as a dodo at this point, yet people ceaselessly use it to draw comparisons with other things at every opportunity.
#1972 posted by necros on 2016/01/21 00:42:30
It was my first, so I have a soft spot for it. <3
I Would Enjoy And Benefit From The Feature Described Above
#1973 posted by Drew on 2016/01/21 03:11:46
Seconded
#1974 posted by mjb on 2016/01/21 13:20:42
I would also enjoy above described feature!
Yeah I Get It ;-)
Any volunteers?
Quark
I'm pretty dense so I've never even been able to do a box map with Quark but with TB2 I've been able to do this:
https://www.dropbox.com/home/Public?preview=spasm0000.jpg
In one session.
Quark's UI has always been a bit like an old steamship to me instead of TB which is a jet ski.
or something.
#1978 posted by 3dioot on 2016/01/23 17:40:06
Yeah Trenchbroom is brilliant! I have been having fun in it too. I feel mapping for Quake really hits the right spot for me. Its full 3d which is more fun then doom but still brush based so you don't have to spend hours creating high resolution assets for it. Combined with the fluidity of the Trenchbroom editor it rocks.
I am still learning but its amazing how quickly you can slot stuff together. Hopefully in the not too distant feature we can show our maps to eachother!
Nice To Hear
Thanks!
#1980 posted by adib on 2016/01/25 02:51:04
In a not too distant future maybe you both take part on a map jam here, showing your maps to all of us.
I'm Looking For A Designer
to make some icons for TrenchBroom. If you are interested, let me know.
Icons
#1982 posted by Skiffy on 2016/01/27 06:44:21
Got a list of needed icons anywhere? I can check the latest build. When do you need this by?
Icons
What do you need?
Thanks Guys
Someone has already volunteered and I don't want to turn this into a contest. Let's see how his icons turn out first.
Hmm..
#1985 posted by xaGe on 2016/01/28 04:09:53
This talk of icon design any indication we might see a public release of TB version 2 soon?
Adib
Still working on my first real SP map. Not much completed lately but hoping to complete it in February. It's not really an epic so far but I am enjoying TB2.
Parse Error
Trying to use gtkradiant's .def files with TB and getting
"Parse error at line 457, column 53: Expected token type newline but got question mark"
This line is
/*QUAKED light (0 1 0) (-8 -8 -8) (8 8 8) START_OFF ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
afaik ??? marks skipped flags so it wouldn't be wise to simply remove it.
How should I go around it?
If I select predefined quake.fgd, func group is missing completely and trigger group only has counter and relay in it. That is what I noticed first, probably other missing entities in other groups.
Please Report On Github.
SleepwalkR
Should I create separate issues or one for both problems?
#1990 posted by necros on 2016/01/30 14:07:30
Going by that line, yes, you can remove them. Or replace with single ?
Replacing each ??? with ? didn't work. If you meant replacing everything after START_OFF with a single ? sign, then I'm kinda scared to do that.
It might fix this specific line, but I would still have something like
/*QUAKED monster_enforcer (1 0 0) (-16 -16 -24) (16 16 40) AMBUSH ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? NOT_EASY NOT_NORM NOT_HARD NOT_DM
pretty sure that would screw up flags.
Two Separate Issues Please ;-)
Back From The Dead
Crawling my way back to mapping after a hiatus of ... four or five months, I think. Real life, etc.
I seem to be very good at forgetting what I've learnt. Right now trying to update my TB2 build to the latest version, but I've managed to screw something up, I think.
I went to my ~/TB2/TrenchBroom/build directory and typed
git pull
then
cmake ..
then
cmake --build .
which is as far as I can tell what I've always done, as per instructions SleepwalkR gave me (like two million years ago). But apparently I've done something stupid, because I get this error message:
[ 0%] Built target GenerateVersion
[ 0%] Built target glew
[ 0%] Generating gen-help/index.html
make[2]: pandoc: Command not found
make[2]: *** [gen-help/index.html] Error 127
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/GenerateHelp.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
This is all on Linux, by the way.
Help! Please?
PS: I wish the forum had a zombie icon. That mask-thingie will have to do for now.
#1994 posted by Spirit on 2016/02/17 15:12:06
pandoc: Command not found
means that the compilation process unsuccessfully tried to find the command (program) pandoc/b>. You need to install whatever package provides the pandoc tool. It is probably just called "pandoc". ;)
That Worked, Thanks!
Thank you, Spirit!
Now let's see how long it takes me to break something else...
|