News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
Quake Custom Engines
Discuss modified Quake engines here, I guess. What engines do you use? What are the pros/cons of existing engines? What features would you like to see implemented/removed?
First | Previous | Next | Last
Md3 
i've seen vertex dancing on md3 though... it's a lot less, but it's still there. is there no better format? 
Oh... 
what about something similar to external textures...
so you have your player.mdl
and then you have player_0.fbx, player_1.fbx, etc... and give external model information.

the workflow these days is to export multiple single frames and use tools to merge them into a .mdl anyway, so for the modeller, it's not adding any steps anyway. 
@mwh, Sleepwalkr, Etc. 
mwh:I think the point is more that observing that this is a problem does not bring us any closer to a solution.

I just want to prevent myself from writing bad code in the future (and I hope I have the definition correct and complete). And needed to know what "bad code" looks like --- bad code isn't obvious.

That is all I can do.

sleepwalkr:So, I for one don't believe that there will ever be a system that will write your code for you.

Is anyone actually writing any complex code to begin with? I don't know that ..

1) Anyone is.
2) If it is even possible to do so.

You've put tons of work into Trenchbroom, but isn't it all rendering triangles by distance at the end of a frame, when everything is said and done?

Developers: creators of simple works, using crude tools. Rewarded with praise for winning the endurance and stamina test using crude tools that are hard to understand, use correctly and master. The idea conceived in seconds, the debugging achieved in hours, but the implementation --- should it ever come --- will take months, if ever at all.

However, if you master a low-level language like C, you can do almost anything without any natural limitations except time. Knowing time is the limitation, I want to re-evaluate my use of it.

I do know the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

I think this sums up current thoughts on the subject quite well: http://forums.inside3d.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1283&start=2

I debated on clicking 'Submit'. Logic says no. The Labatt's Blue says "apathy now". And who am I to question the logic of beer! 
Too Bad To See A Nice Post Go To Waste 
Just a quick reply then:

You've put tons of work into Trenchbroom, but isn't it all rendering triangles by distance at the end of a frame, when everything is said and done?

Not by a long shot. 
 
bad code isn't obvious.

I take offense to that. Mine certainly is. 
Engine Coders... 
Currently we can choose between linear filtering and nearest-neighbor filtering. How about giving hqx a try? 
 
The filtering that is currently available is there because the hardware supports it, hqx would probably have to be done by up sampling the textures in software and loading the higher res images to the video card. Which you could also do manually using external textures. 
 
Question is would hqx even look good on quake textures, since it's designed for pixel art 
 
Yeah hqx only looks half-decent on stuff like nes sprites - In Quake it would just look like you've upscaled the texture then run them through some ugly watercolour filter or something. 
 
I looked into other texture filtering once and it is not worth it unless you are into amateur painter art. 
 
No idea what I used to create them but here is scale4x: https://transfer.sh/Liu3e/scale4x.7z 
Sorry, I Should Stop Using That Site, They Had Direct Download Links.. 
 
8-bit Software Renderer + Bsp2 
 
awesome, always good to see bsp2 on a wider range of engines! 
Very Cool 
also, that RRP video revealed to me a design flaw in the burning player effect from rubicon 2 -- if your health is > 100, you can't pick up a health pack, which means you can't stop the burning! 
Cool 
Especially that MadFox map for RRP looks good. 
I Love This Engine... 
It really is fun to play Quake on, and it's often overlooked (I have to remind myself it exists occasionally). What I really love is low-grav + gore. This makes Quake even gorier :)

Here's some gore screens from my low grav map (coming soon I hope) -

https://www.dropbox.com/s/vfu25hshcyv71s2/qbs8_003.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/p6ar35jwz14y9p1/qbs8_004.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9cdnkifemxz2tld/qbs8_005.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pyedcf3wwqqa453/qbs8_006.png?dl=0 
Hmmm 
super8 - pretty cool, but when fog and coloured lighting is all going on, you tend to lose a lot when you try and map that back to the quake palette. 
Hmmmmmmm 
Super8 - played in it for five minutes - could kinda do with "make it look/sound like quake" preset in the options :)

Over-the-top weapon bobbing craziness...quake's 8-bit sounds up-sampled to whatever...starts with a funky palette bend by default...not my cup of chai I'm afraid :) 
 
I wish you guys realised how bloody annoying Dropbox is. Every time I click a link here, I get a popup if I want to join it. 
Yeah - Seriously Just Use Imgur For Picture Uploads 
 
 
Uhh, is the new bobbing combined with the regular bobbing? It looks like the weapon is twitching in all directions at once. 
Then 
you have to join it
It is simple as that 
Why Wouldn't You Use Dropbox? 
It's literally the most useful thing I've ever signed up to, it's the first thing I get going after a fresh install.

Seriously just get it already. 
Why Wouldn't I Use Obnoxious Bloatware? 
This boggles the mind!

Use imgur or GTFO. 
First | Previous | Next | Last
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.