#19538 posted by Spirit on 2010/11/06 20:58:41
Ah, are those on subsequent lines? And all of the same class?
JEdit is my favourite editor and it can easily do this. It is free, open-source and cross-platform. http://www.jedit.org/
Select the classname. Ctrl-F for the Search and Replace dialog. Copy the line to the "Replace with" form. Use Ctrl-Enter to add a linebreak. Add your new field. "Replace all".
http://s1.image.gd/o/25/258bfa3b7540f0b2484ef75076130ffa21851ee8.png
Make sure it will search in "Current Buffer". You might want to turn regular expressions off, should not be an issue here though.
Notepad++ Can Do It Too
#19539 posted by negke on 2010/11/06 21:01:09
Even with \n
BspEditor
#19540 posted by Mike Woodham on 2010/11/06 21:29:56
Edit - Select - By Value - Entity Type - OK
Worldcraft Can Do It
#19541 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/11/06 21:37:41
map > entity report > theen you modify the filter, you can search by key/value, class, and select point ents, brush ents or both > then click "Mark", then you close the dialogue and go to the selection tool, you will find all of the marked objects are selected :D
Regular Expressions
#19542 posted by SleepwalkR on 2010/11/06 23:55:17
ftw
So Easy A Caveman Can Do It
#19543 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/11/07 00:11:21
nt
Whose Program Is The Best?
#19544 posted by negke on 2010/11/07 09:50:29
Fap on!
I Can Do It.
#19545 posted by madfox on 2010/11/07 19:34:49
don't Prog me RAM!
I know, just foolin'.
But these headlines
looks so stupid.
Rj
#19546 posted by necros on 2010/11/07 22:36:38
yeah, i was thinking of making a program that would just parse the entity list and load it up into some kind of easy to access and modify gui, but since the text editor solution works, i no longer have any reason to do that. :P :P
Ten Years Ago
#19547 posted by SleepwalkR on 2010/11/07 23:11:09
I was planning to design a simple language that would allow all kinds of transformations on Quake maps, but it never happened because I didn't know enough about language design. Today that would be called a domain specific language and there are lots of tools that would allow generating such a language very easily... maybe I'll get back to it sometime.
Sleep
#19548 posted by rj on 2010/11/07 23:28:27
sounds interesting. look forward to it :)
Snatched Off DW
#19549 posted by negke on 2010/11/08 10:44:22
Negke
#19550 posted by JPL on 2010/11/08 13:13:25
I cannot recognize the map layout: which map is it ?
The Second One
#19551 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/11/08 13:23:09
Its COD MW2 isnt it?
I Don't Think So
#19552 posted by jt_ on 2010/11/08 15:12:37
I've played a fair share of duty, but that doesn't remind me of any of the maps.
Well They Are On A Rail
#19553 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/11/08 15:17:26
And they do have cutscenes
#19554 posted by starbuck on 2010/11/08 16:02:22
i don't remember that many corners though
Doom.
#19555 posted by bal on 2010/11/08 20:15:41
E1M6.
So much sad truth in that image. :(
WOW
#19556 posted by Tronyn on 2010/11/08 22:24:35
that is soooo goddamn true
Horsecrap.
#19557 posted by gb on 2010/11/09 15:03:37
.
Simplifying things to that degree always makes it seemingly convincing. I could just as easily montage a 320x200 DOOM screen next to a 1920x1280 Brink/Rage/Singularity screen and say "See?"
That's too simple.
1993 FPS maps have an entry, an exit, and killing stuff in between just like 2010 ones. Lots of Doom and Quake maps aren't exactly complex. Plus, with Doom's sector based engine creating maps was a lot simpler and faster, but I doubt most people today would buy a sector/sprite based FPS if someone made it.
And I drunkenly played DOOM/2 to death in high school in 1993/4. I remember it. It was unnecessarily easy to get lost in and it often took half a keyboard-massaging hour to find where that last button was while the huge brown pixels started making swirling images behind my sleepy eyes. 320x240 pixels on a 640x480 screen. A lot of the areas look the same in DOOM/2 levels. I especially remember the chainsaw labyrinth, the crate labyrinth in e2 I think, and those horrible city levels in Doom 2.
Of course by now, you know where everything is. But back then, I wormed my way through samey-looking brown corridors in the search for identical looking switches with green and red lights on them, running from pixel pinkies that we called "the big ones" and endless hordes of imps and chaingunners while always looking for health but not finding any.
It was awesome, and it still is, but it wasn't all perfect either. New games also have something going for them.
Rose-coloured glasses.
I Wish Func Had An Ignore Button
To Balance It
#19559 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/11/09 16:50:09
Gb
#19560 posted by negke on 2010/11/09 17:08:20
Back then you were free to get lost. Nowadays you're forced to find the way. If that makes any sense...
Gb
#19561 posted by negke on 2010/11/09 17:08:21
Back then you were free to get lost. Nowadays you're forced to find the way. If that makes any sense...
Well
#19562 posted by Tronyn on 2010/11/09 17:20:00
I hardly played Doom2 at all, I got the impression that the level design was very inferior, but the design in Doom1 was awesome, and I don't remember getting lost at all except (lol) in the corridors through slime in the bottom righthand corner of e1m6, in that picture. Doom3 was ON RAILS, a huge step backward. The picture has that exactly right. I realize Doom3 itself isn't that modern anymore and there's newer games that give you lots of freedom (Far Cry), but I agree with that criticism of what's going on. Being free to get lost means the developers aren't spoon-feeding you.
|