 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
It's cheaper than buying additional hardware, let's you work on multiple machines and also protects against meteor strikes and house fires - unless they happen to you and not your machine.
Read your Doom vs Quake thing recently, and while Terra was indeed fun, I wonder if the issue isn't what seems _impressive_ in a given game. It was very easy to seem impressive in Doom; maybe I haven't played enough (or new enough) custom Doom maps, but it seems like in the context of Doom (which, by the way, will always equal OR exceed Quake in my heart) you can only be so impressive. In Quake, you can make a guy look up to a distant tower, or down over a cliff; this makes the compilation time waaaaaay longer but it achieves a cinematic effect I think Doom could never do. It all goes back to what Romero said with the original Quake levels; that it simply takes 5-6 times to do something which seems equally impressive. My 0.02.
from the few months i spent working with doom, doing the really impressive stuff takes about 5x the amount of work it would take to do it in quake. a simple thing like adding more than 1 texture per wall is fairly roundabout whereas in quake, you'd just bust out the 3 point clipper and slice the brush in half.
working on the doom map, i found there were many times where i wished i could do some fancy stuff like trisoup terrain/caverns and overhanging areas. but i just couldn't, either because it was impossible or i just wasn't willing to commit the effort into using the fiddly new engine port features. in the end, that kind of limitation made me more productive in that i had to accept the limitation and move on. there are plenty of areas i feel would look more than 2 times as cool if they were in quake. it's the way the limitations are enforced in the two engines. doom's limitations are rules that cannot be broken. "you cannot place one sector over another. ever." "if too many sectors are visible at a time, the engine will crash." quake's limitations are a lot more vague. In Quake, you can make a guy look up to a distant tower, or down over a cliff; this makes the compilation time waaaaaay longer but it achieves a cinematic effect I think Doom could never do. you can have some pretty huge areas in doom. i think even larger than quake because i didn't seem to notice any kind of maximum extents. currently, my doom map goes from -13k to 9k. mind you, this is in zdoom. it's possible stock doom would explode, but i can't even run it to see. :P that said, i never finished the doom map because i lost interest in doom. sooo not much of a win for doom overall. :P I guess the Home Premium edition is actually the "I'm a fucking retard edition" after all :(
I looked at the comparison list when deciding which windows version to buy and professional seemed to have a couple of things I didn't need for accessing the desktop from another machine and ultimate had bit locker, which I also didn't need, so I thought I would pay way less money and get Home Premium. Big mistake. I am already going crazy trying to change options not even available to me because there is so much stupid annoying shit built into the OS I want to disable. Every time I try and change something, I find via some helpful internet forum that I need enterprise (wasn't available to me), professional or ultimate. Applocker whitelisting, group policy editor... FUCK YOU MICROSOFT. Release one god damned version of your fucking OS, not Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, Enterprise, Ultimate. Why the world needs six versions, I don't know. So now I have to upgrade via anytime upgrade, which costs more money and last time I checked, the functionality to pay was disabled, completely preventing me from upgrading. FUCK YOU! I want to just install the warez version of ultimate I have, but I know it will just lead to more hassle :( p.s. if anyone else uses a Wacom tablet as their primary input device and has figured out a way to disable the annoying animated ring when left clicking, please let me know how. i know. i am a piece of shit. :(
for some reason, i just have a really hard time staying interested in any one thing. Thanks for your email! Just got it now because I don't use that email address anymore. It's really nice to know that you don't like my work, I hope it will crash and burn your computer!
Best regards STUPID FUCKING ASSHOLE When I was coming back to mapping wanting to do something single player I considered Doom 2. I had some Half-Life 2 stuff going but despite it's power I found the lack of varied default graphics and the smaller amount of monster types kind of frustrating. I do intend to go back though because it's scripting is amazing.
Wads like Plutonia 2 and Scythe 2 do an insane amount with the Doom engine I think, but both fall into the same trap. You can do huge levels in Doom and they run fine, but (imo!) playing through both wads gets so boring after a while, when every level is a 400+ monsters slog :( Scythe 1 (and so far Scythe X) is one of the best Doom wads imo because all the maps are compact and interesting, and its got some great variety as you go through. It too has a couple of insane monster count levels but not that many... Can you just get a room?
Like on a email address you only use to insult each other? Really, you're always going to talk to someone, sooner or later, who pisses you off. No need for the rest of us to read the crap as well. I like my fence - I had a cushion installed. 2nd'd the posting of the email btw. Not necessarily in here, but I think further examples of what a distasteful person Trinca is would be educational.
Nvidia filter, seems to do the same thing.
http://developer.nvidia.com/object/photoshop_dds_plugins.html Do you know this one? I can't test atm since I've just changed the office PC (and Quake doesn't need normalmaps). same here. it's got a semi decent preview feature too but sometimes it fails rather badly. still, it always generates a good normal map.
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |