Books Have Gone Way Backwards Imho
#18987 posted by stevenaaus on 2010/07/20 09:23:37
Partly because of the dilution of talent to other media, partly lost skills, and also because the printing press is so accessible. (Look at the quality of the average forum post on the web). Not to say classics don't happen anymore, but they're hard to find.
Everything has changed anyway.. there's no chance i'd ever get round to reading tolstoy or hugo today. We're just too artsy busy with crappy electronic stuff i love like games, sport, cinema, music.
...Today my box set of Kinski/Herzog arrived from the UK for 18 quid ;>
Oh, It Does Apply To Music And Books
#18988 posted by megaman on 2010/07/20 09:42:14
just that the timespans are much longer. Shakespeare or Music from the 17th/18th century doesn't appeal to me, while Music with the same instruments from this (or the last) century does.
Gb
#18989 posted by negke on 2010/07/20 10:34:11
Yes, but if the demo ends after only a couple of seconds, it leaves the rest of the map untested.
Books??
#18990 posted by Shambler on 2010/07/20 11:25:11
Alistair Reynolds, China Meiville, Iain (M) Banks, Greg Egan, Paul Auster, Christopher Priest, Jeffrey Ford nuff said.
Well
#18991 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/07/20 14:25:32
I've read a couple Alistair Reynolds and Iain Banks, imo they are no Watership Down. I actually just finished Chasm City this week, after forcing myself to slough through it for the past several months. It was actually really awful. Revelation Space was at least average-ish.
Would like to try that China Meiville person, but I'd expect to be slightly disappointed as well.
Zwiffle
Do you like anything?
Your Mom
#18993 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/07/20 15:08:01
No, I kid, I don't like her either.
/asshole
Zwiffle.
#18994 posted by Shambler on 2010/07/20 16:58:16
You need to drink enough household chemicals to wipe out the part of your deluded little turd of a brain that is responsible for understanding language and the written word, because you clearly can't be trusted with it.
Of course they aren't Watership Down because they're not fucking outdated kids books about fucking rabbits!! Banks and Reynolds produce some of the sharpest, most creative, imaginative, and punchily written books of recent times. Okay they happen to mostly be in the sci-fi genre but ffs talking rabbits.
I despair.
Func Is Pretty Intense These Days
#18995 posted by Drew on 2010/07/20 16:59:44
Dude
#18996 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/07/20 17:14:09
Chasm City was sharp to you? That book is not worth something really worthless.
Beestings. It's not worth beestings. Whatever, you know what I mean.
Watership Down was a great story, what I've read of Alistair Reynolds and Iain M Banks were not. Of course you wouldn't make the connection. Forget the genres, they're just not good books. I mean seriously, unless you like book-versions of made-for-tv Syfy movies.
Dudess.
#18997 posted by Shambler on 2010/07/20 17:55:08
Yes, sharp. Hard sci-fi concepts presented clearly and succinctly to give them a good impact.
Clearly you know nothing of stories or book quality. Are you sure human is your first language??
Beestings = your cock.
#18998 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/07/20 18:05:40
Human is not a language, perhaps that's your problem. American, mother fucker, do you speak it?
As for Chasm City, forget the hard sci-fi concepts, (of which only 2 or 3 presented I thought were interesting in any capacity) the story sucked hard. The characters were really flat, the dialogue literally made me groan out of disgust, and the 'twists' were both predictable and lamentable, mainly because they added absolutely nothing to the story.
Excession, on the other hand, forced me to wonder why there were any human characters in it at all. The only reason there seemed to be human characters was so they could fuck in zero Gs and make stupid comments about pointless shit. For people who lived for centuries they sure acted like a bunch of fucking angsty teenagers. The ships themselves were the only interesting thing (truly, they were very interesting,) but regrettably were so nondescript and generic they essentially became background props for said zero G fucking. Also, the story was pointless and I wish the main characters ended up dying in a very horrible way, yet somehow, for some reason, ended up getting exactly what they wanted. Fucking rubbish.
Arther C Clarke, mother fucker.
#18999 posted by meTch on 2010/07/20 18:37:58
Animal Farm has talking animals, is that also a child's book?
Animal Farm...
#19000 posted by JPL on 2010/07/20 19:21:53
... I hope you are not refering to zoophilia....
OMG !!!
#19001 posted by Mr. Hands on 2010/07/20 19:24:37
Hi JPL, long time no see.
Mr Hands...
#19002 posted by JPL on 2010/07/20 21:14:22
... who are you ?
No
#19003 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/07/20 21:15:12
Leave Mr Hands out of this.
Zwiffle...
#19004 posted by JPL on 2010/07/20 21:23:59
.. OK
Mr Hands! Get out !
Orthomanual Hands
#19005 posted by madfox on 2010/07/20 22:07:47
Weeping the dirt of my face reading this thrunk.
I remember I played Unreal and thereafter was left in a room with a box. The box was unreal.
I went working in my shed and after an houre I saw a trashbox in the corner, yes, unreal on it.
I'm reading The Niggershed of Uncle Tom, maybe that's way I'm weeping.
I started a commic of my last level, quake is reinteractive.
When I drove home on my bike I forgot to watch out for the car-lever on the parking and got tje thing straight in my face. I can hardly see at the moment.
Hmm
#19006 posted by nonentity on 2010/07/20 22:19:15
Iain Banks > Iain M Banks tbh
(yes I'm aware it's the same person)
Random Contribution
#19007 posted by Tronyn on 2010/07/20 22:42:57
Arthur C Clarke is awesome
Yay
#19008 posted by stevenaaus on 2010/07/20 23:32:05
2010 is the greatest movie eva
2010 or Contact ?
Zwiffle
#19009 posted by Vondur on 2010/07/20 23:45:30
i am disappointed
Hmm
#19010 posted by nonentity on 2010/07/21 00:40:20
Not my line, but on a slight tangent;
Space Invaders - Hide behind walls, shoot waves of aliens in attacking you.
Gears of War - Well... You see where this is going.
Fsck being a modern version of Q/Q2/DotT
Hmm
#19011 posted by nonentity on 2010/07/21 00:41:08
'in'?
'that are' even.
I speak human good.
|