Yhatzees AvP Review Was Priceless Anyway
#18266 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/03/17 11:45:01
ROFL
#18267 posted by Shambler on 2010/03/17 12:32:22
Much more like it. Who said he was getting stale??
#18268 posted by Spirit on 2010/03/17 12:54:57
That other review is US american, Zero Punctuation is british. Hmm...
That Other Review
#18269 posted by megaman on 2010/03/17 14:34:17
wasn't even worth pausing my music. Not to speak of my wasted time. Not funny.
Agreed
#18270 posted by SleepwalkR on 2010/03/17 15:20:04
The guy forgot to bring the funny.
TFT Screen
#18271 posted by negke on 2010/03/17 19:17:45
The time to get a TFT is finally here. Going for a 19" one (everything above is too large for my needs, or is it?). What can you tell me about widescreen displays? Seems weird for a computer monitor. How does one work in games - is the display streched? Any real benefit?
WTF?
#18272 posted by Jago on 2010/03/17 20:50:19
Why on earth would you want to map on a small 19" when you can map on a 22-24" on a MUCH larger resolution?
I Have A 22" LG
#18273 posted by megaman on 2010/03/17 20:57:40
http://www.amazon.de/LG-L227WTP-PF-TFT-Monitor-Kontrast-30000/dp/B001H2K2IK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=ce-de&qid=1268855687&sr=8-1
and i'm pretty much satisfied with it, even though I found the colours too intensive at first and calibration was a bitch. Now that i'm used to it, it seems that even if it is wrong (which i don't really know), it's not problematic. Nothing occurs to me as wrong, and i have a crt next to it. it looks different and less intense, but the samsung looks better now.
Gaming is fine unless you're really hardcore gamer and even then you can get used to it.
i'd also agree that larger is better, unless you're desk is in a really, really confined space
That Is
#18274 posted by megaman on 2010/03/17 21:02:55
the crt looks different and less intense.
#18275 posted by Spirit on 2010/03/17 22:20:45
Yes, finally not more nagging about wrong screenshot brightness!
I have a LG Flatron L227WTP and love it. A bit too bright for working so I reduce gamma a bit.
Haha, High-five Megaman
#18276 posted by Spirit on 2010/03/17 22:21:35
What did you calibrate? Do you use sRGB?
Yeah... I Need A Flat Panel Too
#18277 posted by grahf on 2010/03/17 22:42:51
So sick of being blasted by electron guns.
Here's a question... for gaming and mapping, 16:10 or 16:9 aspect ratio?
Also, are there good panels that have component or composite inputs? I would want to plug my game system (PS2 currently) into this.
#18278 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/03/17 22:58:20
I run a 24" Acer at 1920x1080 (16:9) and it works great. I also have a 23" tv with enough separate inputs for my Wii, PS2 and Xbox so I never have to unplug any of them. I just switch modes and there ya go.
Monitors
#18279 posted by Vigil on 2010/03/17 23:12:58
Switched from an old 17" flat screen with three colors to an HP LP2475W 24" monitor, and loving it. Component, HDMI, display port, composite and DVI inputs, great adjustability and viewing angles, and works as a USB hub.
Grahf
#18280 posted by necros on 2010/03/17 23:26:48
i'd go with 16:10.
the popular ones are both 16:10: 1680x1200 and 1440x900. the gigantor 1920x1200 is also 16:10.
besides, if you watch a video that's in 16:9 in a 16:10 monitor, it's the same size. ^_^
16:10
#18281 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/03/18 03:09:42
i had a 16:10 19x12 and now im 16x9 1080p
The 16:10 definately felt better. 16:9 is too wide and not high enough.
My freind just got a 22inch ASUS from the same range as my 24inch ASUS and his is 16:10, mine 16:9, and they feel the same size. What you gain in width from 22inch 16:10 to 24inch 16:9 you loose in height.
Also a 22" 16:10 is likely to be cheaper than a 24" 16:9, but really I would rather have the former.
What i really want is a 24" 16:10 again, but if i decided to upgrade now I would get a 26" :D
Hmmm
#18282 posted by negke on 2010/03/18 10:15:45
The reason I'm aiming for such a small screen is that I sit very close to it (not much space on the table) and want to be able to keep it in full view without having to move my head/eyes too much. In this sense, 22 or 24" must be like sitting in the front row in a cinema. Or so I presume.
#18283 posted by Zwiffle on 2010/03/18 15:27:39
That Just
#18284 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/03/18 17:58:23
made me want to go and try WoW. Im a WoW virgin.
But yeah - she was pretty good looking 8-P
No No No
#18285 posted by ijed on 2010/03/18 18:01:13
WoW is for virgins.
#18286 posted by Shambler on 2010/03/18 18:06:54
Vondurgins...
Well
#18287 posted by ijed on 2010/03/18 18:15:29
I spose there's not many people on those icebergs.
Sorry Master
#18288 posted by ijed on 2010/03/18 18:15:44
Heh
#18289 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/03/18 18:27:16
Sorry Ijed - no time for RemakeQuake for the next 10'000 hours, I have to play World of Warcraft so we can save teh world!!!
Think Of Your Girlfriend, And Your Dog
#18290 posted by ijed on 2010/03/18 19:06:06
|