 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
Im 3/16ths Jock. I dont really know how they can say that with such accuracy, but...... You never know Jean Phillipe, we could be distantly related :P
And I also went about 6 years ago with college.
The first time I went you couldn't walk anywhere near Dam Square or the railway station without getting approached by gangs offering cocaine and ecstacy. In July I was there for 5 days and didnt get offered anything except one guy sailed past me on a bicycle and was saying "cheap hashish!" Smoked a motherload in the coffeshops though 8D exchanged unfinished maps last night and it was pretty neat looking at someone else's work and trying to figure out a way to finish it as your own. I got 2 huge, detailed rooms and he got 20 boxes connected by hallways that wandered off the grid.
All you quakers should partner up and do a sexy map swap today! That would be cool. Have an FTP somewhere that people can drop off stuff they don't want to finish and let other people pick them over if they want, or finish them up.
You have no idea how many people started working on an old scrap of mine and never finished it. :) Hell, metl and I still haven't finished and we've been "working" on it for ages!
the "69" was because it was such a high number, it implied the map would take a really long time to finish. Of course now we are in the 3-digits for speedmaps, so the joke doesn't work. Maybe sm500 or something.
Or we can say it's the infinte regress thing... Does anyone ever put thought into making their maps/mods/whatever accessible? And I mean to people with disabilities, not necessarily newbies.
What?
No, seriously. What? How would that even work, surely it's down to the control interface/device rather than the design of a given map? Let's consider the case of websites.
A blind person may have a text-to-speech device that reads the website. This is all fine and good, but what happens when part of the site's content is an image? And I don't mean a screenshot of a game. You'll notice that some people will have email addresses stored in an image to prevent web crawlers from picking them up and adding the address to a spam database. But what happens if there is no alt text for the image? The blind person has no way to email the author of the site because the screen reader can't read the address. This could potentially be a big issue, especially if this email address is the only means to apply for a job. The employer is no longer providing an equal opportunity for all potential applicants. For websites, the list goes on and on. Navigation items should be in lists. Screen readers offer the ability to skip over lists, so if a blind person doesn't want to navigate to a different page yet he/she can skip over the menu and proceed to the content. Links should avoid using the same link text as a previous link on the same page. When someone is cycling through the links on a page, this makes it easier to identify what is being linked to instead of relying on nearby contextual clues. So clearly the interface is important (in the above examples, that would be the screen reader), but the design and implementation of the content is also very important. Even if someone is using a common interface, such as a stock installation of FireFox, you should still consider content design and avoid red text on a green background since red-green color blindness is a relatively common phenomenon. About the speech tools used, apart from that they're pretty useless (or were) on lots of pronounciations.
Context plz? What would constitute a decent setup outside of web design? It won't matter once we all have occipital jacks, so let's just work on developing those, ok?
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2025 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |