Ask
#17215 posted by madfox on 2009/08/04 16:40:30
Lunaran.
Brightness
#17216 posted by necros on 2009/08/04 19:46:16
there's also the difference between LCD and CRT monitors.
i've found CRTs tend to have a lot more contrast but are also generally darker. LCDs tend to have less contrast at the darker end and are generally brighter.
if you're designing on a CRT, you should set your stuff to default brightness and work from that (using iD levels as a base, but remember those levels are brighter than they need to be). if you are using an LCD, i'd turn down the brightness a little bit and work like that (use iD levels again as a reference).
Do You Really Think That
#17217 posted by Rick on 2009/08/05 01:40:47
the iD maps are too bright? I've always had to turn brightness up just to see on their maps. As a matter of fact, I have a special nVidia profile just for when I play Quake because it's way too dark if I use my normal Windows settings.
Anyway, I've always pretty much used the iD maps as my reference when lighting my maps.
I have my newest computer in the living room hooked up to the tv and I have a hard time deciding if the lighting is right or not when mapping because the lcd TV is way different from the crt monitor I used to use.
Heh - There's A Real Art To Lighting A Quake Map!
#17218 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/08/05 03:13:49
So many forces working against you....
Ive had em all in my short career - to bright, too dark, too shit, to bland, too colourful, meh - you just cant quite please everyone!
I have often re-done large portions of my maps 2 or 3 times sometimes!
#17219 posted by gibbie on 2009/08/05 11:21:56
imo just make sure the lighting in the map spans the entire range of possible values (0-255)... eg 255 close to spotlights, 0 in really dark corners... if you don't do this (for example by using minlight) the map may look washed out or bland. Then play with fall-off and intensity of lights to achieve both sharp and smooth gradients...
look at tyrann's maps for a demonstation
Gibbie!
#17220 posted by Vondur on 2009/08/05 11:45:09
no, YOU!
This
#17221 posted by nitin on 2009/08/05 14:38:25
is very true :
i've found CRTs tend to have a lot more contrast but are also generally darker. LCDs tend to have less contrast at the darker end and are generally brighter.
Also, dont forget idgamma. It seems some of us play with it, some dont.
Also
don't forget
V O N D U R
Vonder
#17223 posted by gibbie on 2009/08/05 22:14:27
no, YUO!
Server Problems Fixed
#17224 posted by SleepwalkR on 2009/08/06 10:46:12
Hi guys, just to let you know, the problem that brought the server to a halt every so often is now fixed. I am to blame for this; I used braindead SQL queries on the cube forum.
#17225 posted by mwh on 2009/08/06 11:31:16
Ah, just posted about that in site help :)
Painkiller
#17226 posted by negke on 2009/08/06 15:40:24
Do/Did people make Painkiller SP maps (with proper gameplay)? Is there a mapping community?
AFAIK No
#17227 posted by ijed on 2009/08/06 15:44:50
Because they never released dev tools.
Fucking shame.
They Did Release Dev Tools
#17228 posted by necros on 2009/08/06 20:23:50
but making PK maps is all done in 3d apps. there have been a handful of full custom maps but the lack of an accessible way of building them is most likely the reason why there aren't more.
#17229 posted by AEnoch on 2009/08/07 01:19:53
id didn't release dev tools for doom I or II or Quake or Quake 2 and we somehow managed...
ROFL @ AEnoch
#17230 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/08/07 01:44:18
very funny
Hmm
#17231 posted by nonentity on 2009/08/07 11:59:38
Sleep, the red text 'too many queries' one?
Nice one :)
Yeah
#17232 posted by SleepwalkR on 2009/08/07 21:24:15
that one. If the server was reachable.
I'm Gonna Update/upgrade
#17233 posted by spy on 2009/08/08 09:19:33
my old/crappy version of opera(9.25), so maybe someone can suggest which version of opera should i use. and i don't like an interface of its recent versions
#17234 posted by Spirit on 2009/08/08 10:09:42
Tango Clearlooks is a nice theme. Always use the latest stable of your browser or you expose yourself to security issues.
#17235 posted by Ankh on 2009/08/08 10:11:40
I have used opera for many years and some months ago I have switched to firefox and I don't think I will go back any more.
I know this isn't the answer you seek. :)
Opera?!
#17236 posted by SleepwalkR on 2009/08/08 11:49:02
That's STILL around?
Opera Kicks Ass.
#17237 posted by Spirit on 2009/08/08 12:53:07
Especially on Linux where Firefox sucks badly. Plus I don't need a gazillion of addons to get basic functionality.
Yeah
#17238 posted by SleepwalkR on 2009/08/08 14:13:50
Firefox turned south the minute the Mozilla Foundation lay their claws on it. It's become the new Netscape if you ask me. The rendering engine may be fine, but it's become slow, fat and ugly over the years. To me, Webkit is the superior engine anyway, and Safari is by far the nicest browser on the mac platform. Don't know about the windows version though. And isn't there a Webkit-based browser for Linux, too? Didn't Webkit originate from the Konqueror project?
#17239 posted by JneeraZ on 2009/08/08 14:40:32
I use Safari on Mac as well. It's a great browser for my needs.
|