GtkRadiant 1.4. because 1.5 onwards was a step backwards in editing speed and efficiency.

3D View Problem
#16533 posted by
RickyT33 on 2009/04/12 06:39:14
happens sometimes. I dont know why. It has happened to me a couple of times, totally weird shit man! I love WC 3.3, and I have an NVidia card, I actually think that the display drivers have an effect on this sometimes.
I Gather that GTK Radiant 1.40 is meant to be mustard. And BSP editor also, and some crazy mappers use QuArK. And Spirit uses blender. That Spirit!

QERadiant Build 147
#16535 posted by
metlslime on 2009/04/12 12:11:56
...but that's just because I am stuck in my ways and too lazy to figure out a new workflow.

Help!
#16537 posted by Rusty Shackleford on 2009/04/12 18:16:08
Hey could someone recommend a cool map that uses alot of crates?
#16538 posted by
Spirit on 2009/04/12 18:55:31
#16539 posted by
starbuck on 2009/04/12 19:05:30
scampie once made a speedmap set inside a crate!

Wow!
#16542 posted by Rusty S. on 2009/04/12 19:36:44
That apsp2 map is totally what I was talking about. THanks

It�s
#16543 posted by
ijed on 2009/04/12 23:03:06
In most (all?) �top ten base maps� and in most �best maps ever� lists.

Starbuck
#16545 posted by
- on 2009/04/13 09:33:16
well, technically it was a giant toilet inside a giant crate, which little func_train crates floating in the bowl.

How Can I Forget
#16546 posted by
starbuck on 2009/04/13 22:34:58
the wonderful gigantic toilet? A touching tribute to a lifetime of cottaging perhaps?

Awesome
#16547 posted by
JPL on 2009/04/15 12:08:09

Terrafusion
#16548 posted by
DaZ on 2009/04/15 21:01:31
what happened to it? Did you move to a different irc server? Cant find anyone on gamesurge :o

DaZ
#16549 posted by
JPL on 2009/04/15 21:18:54
Dunno, you should rather use
irc.quakenet.org
6667-6669
This one works for sure ;)

People Who Whine About DRM And Similar Protection...
#16552 posted by
Shambler on 2009/04/16 16:47:28
...biggest bunch of tedious spoilt irritating mindless cunts in the gaming scene. Death is too good for them, these people don't even deserve a chance at life in the first place, let alone one with the first world trappings of current computers and the internet.
If I was a bit more flamboyant financially I'd get into the habit of splashing out on DRM games just to show some support and show I just want to play a game and don't give a flying shit about "OMG only having a limited number of activations" (which would have affected Q1/Q2/Unreal/UT, I make that about 15% of the games I own) and all the other horrific and cruel hardships modern gamers have to endure. If I ever meet one of these pathetic dribblers in real life they can endure my Air360s in their ballsac and a litre of my stinking piss on their spotty LCD-tanned face. CUNTS.

LOL
#16553 posted by
DaZ on 2009/04/16 16:56:36
litre of my stinking piss on their spotty LCD-tanned face
Quote of the year.
As for DRM, I have mixed feelings.
Non-refundable install limit is total bollocks, as someone could legitimately use them all up and then not be able to play the game again, which considering they PAID for it is total shit!
However, a lot of companies now offer the "refundable" install limit where can you deactivate an install of the game. As long as the tool to do this is easy to use and doesn't piss around then its fine.
Then you have Steam, which is the best way of doing it, as it doesn't affect the end user at all, and you can download and play all your games on any pc with an internet connection.

Well
#16555 posted by
ijed on 2009/04/16 17:12:46
Most of the complaints are pretty ridiculous and just something for tweens to get rant lulls or whatever the fuck about.
I'm a happy steam user <checks> with 38 games and despite it's occasional spaz outs it's pretty good.
The one that did stop me was DOW2 which has two DRM's - Steam and Windows Live. What for?
Probably will buy it someday, but just that 5% of added inconvenience (only for my benefit as a valued customer!) meant I spent the money on a night on the piss instead.

Hmm
#16556 posted by
nonentity on 2009/04/16 20:04:34
A fair rant given the level of discourse generally surrounding copy protection/DRM.
However, with DRM specifically I take issue on moral grounds rather than logistical ones (I've never found DRM restrictive in practise, but in my eyes that's actually irrelevant)