Looks Fine Here
#138 posted by
ericw on 2015/01/22 02:11:13
Seems to just be shadows from the chain!
Lovely Stuff Warren!
#140 posted by
Skiffy on 2015/01/22 17:43:44
Hmmm wonder what my map would look like with this AO pass now...
God Damn
#141 posted by
necros on 2015/01/23 22:53:45
that is some sexy looking dirty brushwork!
That...
#143 posted by
quaketree on 2015/01/25 05:00:34
Is very nice. The lighting and shadows are very believable. Maybe we need an "ikebony" type texture set.
Wow
#145 posted by
starbuck on 2015/01/25 13:06:49
that's awesome! Would love to see a whole Quake level that looked like that
I have to think that perhaps the ikwhite jam maps would have looked about 10x better with these tools *HINT HINT*
#148 posted by
Spirit on 2015/01/25 15:01:00
eh, the geometry sticking out over the shadowed areas looks all wrong or are those bars actually floating and not connected to walls and floor?
WarrenM
#149 posted by
Breezeep_ on 2015/01/25 15:17:31
How did you do that? What compilers did you use?
Quaddy
#150 posted by
Kinn on 2015/01/25 15:31:16
Photoshop + Levels adjustment layer I believe.
Willem, Is Your Computer In Your Yard?
#152 posted by
Lunaran on 2015/01/25 16:47:10
The shot is me trying to add the sky-scatter that metlslime described somewhere earlier. (taken with r_lightmap 1.) still playing with it.
I want to try it on lava, too, because I lit my jam2 map mainly by trying to match what a feature like that would look like.
#153 posted by
JneeraZ on 2015/01/25 17:58:55
Is yours in the broom closet? :)
After Experimenting With The Compilers And Lighting Tricks...
#154 posted by
Breezeep_ on 2015/01/26 17:03:05
Ericw Please Enable Antialiasing By Default
Quaddy
#157 posted by
generic on 2015/01/26 20:25:44
Looks inviting :)
What compilers and settings did you use?
"Please Enable Antialiasing By Default "
#158 posted by
Lunaran on 2015/01/26 20:33:04
does typing -extra4 take that long?
That Too
But I meant quakespasm.exe, not light.exe.
#160 posted by
Lunaran on 2015/01/26 21:26:13
People have suggested using an external text file to specify what surfaces should give off light. This is exactly what Valve did for hl/hl2/etc via "mapname.rad."
This is sensible enough as a decision on its own, but one of the pains of the Source engine is that everything is in a different text file with its own syntax parsed by a different command line tool. If you take the Quake engine and add features piecemeal over 20 years, making a lot of small sensible decisions in a vacuum without building toward some kind of more perfect ideal, you're recreating the exact steps for creating the Source engine. :)
So: is there something better we can do? Someone suggested the Q2 map format, which, yes, it does that, but then we all need a level editor that loads Q1 texture wads but has a Q2 surface property dialog and saves the Q2 map format, which is zero editors. It could be one editor, if sleep puts it in TB, but everyone assumes sleep is adding everything to TB and not everyone uses TB anyway.
I'm a fan of worldspawn keys - something I've considered adding to tyrlight is mirroring worldspawn keys on the command line, and command line flags as worldspawn keys. If I decide on a specific set of dirt variables or whatever that looks good with map A, I don't have to have a special set of map A batch files, I can just save the settings into the map. Or, if I want to fine-tune my sunlight I can just relight it with a different -sunmangle over and over at the command line without having to edit the map and do an -onlyents repeatedly each time too.
I personally wouldn't use a surfacelight definition, though, since it's more important to me that every room is tweaked to look its best than a texture emit the same amount of light every time it's used, specifying light per texture name just takes away that ability. With a 16 unit luxel, area lights are never very visually distinct from pointlights anyway, unless you're talking about a significantly large surface, like the sky or a pool of slime or lava. I don't think that's enough to justify light emission on a per-texture basis - do you need two different light levels emitted from two different lava textures? Per-content-flag is enough for that, which is how sun and skylight already work.
For Surface Lights:
#161 posted by
- on 2015/01/26 22:16:39
What if you just had light entities (likely placed in a box outside the main level) and you could add a "_surface" key to them that you declared a texture name. The light compiler would then do q2/q3 style light from all surfaces with that texture name using clones of that light entity. This makes it compatible with all editors, and isn't that difficult a setup.
Sleep Puts Everything In TB
I could very simply enable the surface flag editor for Quake 1 maps, yes. But you'd have to wait for TB2, as TB1 doesn't support Quake 2 at all.