"Barf Cum Dongs" and "Scumbag Frond" are both on the first page of results.

there's also "Scrag Mob Fund" 

The incarnation of productivity. 

I was browsing youtube for Left 4 Dead vids when I stumbled upon this pretty cool little walk-through video.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=atuZvbEPsAg

Its a complete remake of the shopping mall from the 2004 remake of "Dawn of the dead", and I must say the sheer size and attention to detail is very impressive.

Apparently the map is part of the Half-Life 2 modification called "No more room in hell" which you can find here : http://www.nomoreroominhell.com/?page=main

Braintastic! 

he's walked down 74'976'298.8819 roads?

The answer my freind is.... 

 

 

 

 

 

the answers is infact 74'976'298.8819.

Dummies.

OK, so HeadThump was very very close. I would definitely have rounded it up rather than down. 

if you watching where you were going you would have realized the partial is not a complete road but a mere gravel path that will lead to a upper middle class cul de sac of homes at some future date. So the answer is 74'976'298. 

I gave the benefit of the doubt that you or the subject of the analogy may have walked that path at some date in the past when it was indeed a road, but unfortunately the geographical schemata I found in the county records shows that the ground the path stretches across has never been developed for use. The Underurth Archives of the long dead Stenonychosaurus inequalis show they never developed that particular partial of land either, and a similar inquiry to previous BigFoot and alien inhabitants
came back with the same null results. Sorry. 

I swear it, you're wrong! It's zero.
I've re-thought my stance on the issue, and it has come clear to me now that the answer is definitely zero.
You see the man is quite capable of saying he had walked down any number of roads, regardless of the true figure. 

In almost any other circumstance where you didn't play upon a Bob Dylan lyric from his pre-psychedelic phase, I would fully and gladly state, 'you are CORRECT, sir!', however, you did choose a Bob Dylan lyric and therein lies the error in the application of the phrase 'before he can say', as you would like it to be read,and as it could be read without error outside the Dylan lexicon which you chose to appropriate. In the Dylan lexicon, this phrase like many of his others, given Dylan was a product of his time and he soaked up much of the culture, ideas and taboos of the Beats who were quite obsessed with the false, pretend, plastic lives of the 'gray flannel men' and who also wanted to live lives of authentic experience where one's language was plain spoken and the words coming from one's lips were true to the inner self, like a Dharma Bum, denotes a meaning of authenticity, in other words in Dylan speak, you cannot express 'before he can say' without it meaning what is simply expressed without lies or misdirection. Sorry, nice try though. 

we could be dealing with a dastardly liar who though familiar with Dylan is willing to misappropriate his words. In that case the answer, my friend, is not 'zero' because the question was never honestly asked, but 'null and void' instead. 

WTF retard topic is this?

Can we go back to debating dongs or some other intelligent discussion? 

beer for me!

or whatever which road he took? 

it looks like our plan is working ;) 

this was one.

I still think zero, how about this:

The man in question was declared a 'man' by the sixth word of the verse, and therefore could say he was a man there and then, regardless of of how many roads he had walked down. I mean that would be true to the Dylan version.
But this was a grossly mutated version of his original verse, the question not being weather or not he was a man, but being weather or not he could say that he had walked down 74'976'298.8819 roads, and due to the generation gap between the originator of this instance of the verse and Dylan, the difference in the overall "message" is much more easily understood. 

distortion in the plausible alternative scenario you give where the state of mind of the man who asks the question doesn't necessarily reflect on his honesty therefore the integrity of the implied contract between the questioner and the recipient of that question isn't rendered null and void on the face of it due to a breech. I like it. Zero it is then. 

you never know what func will bring you on any given day. 

mafia hit burgers 

from it that show screenies from Deus Ex III? Some encouraging info there concerning how the game will play, but is that Gunther wearing a frilly doublet? I can't tell for certain from the low rez screenies I've seen but it sure looks like it. That is kind of gross. It wont be easy explaining this style change up within the Deus Ex continuity given the clothes in the first one are gritty urban for the most part.

Am I the only one who has noticed a resemblance between Gunther and the often great defensive lineman Brian Urlacher?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Urlacher 

on the same hand side of the keys. Will do the honorable thing and commit Seppuku. It is the only honorable thing to do with a spelling error that grotesque. Here it goes -- blehhhh!! Hurts so much, damn, wow . . . feeling cold, is that you Marmaduke . . . 

In an interview with Edge magazine, published tomorrow, Dugas says the original Deus Ex was �kind of slow�. He added, �There weren�t enough exciting, memorable moments. It was aimed more towards a simulation rather than a game experience.�
http://www.edge-online.com/news/deus-ex-was-�kinda-slow�-says-deus-ex-3-dev