Yeah, it's your PS2. The game played perfectly for me way back when. 

can use a cutscene to attack the big statue thing

Gotta love modern game design >_> 

In seriousness, you do. The giant statue battles in the God of War games are awesome spectacles that I never would have dreamed were possible even 5 years ago. Fucking -awesome- fun! 

no matter how visually impressive they are, quick-time events still suck arse as a gameplay mechanic. 

awesome spectacles

!=

-awesome- fun! 

I'm sorry but if you don't find the God of War games to be awesome fun you need to turn in your gamer badge and get out. Seriously.

And yes, QuickTime events suck but the rest of the game makes up for them IMO. It isn't like it's a crap game AND it has QTE stuck in. 

And the giant statue fights, unless I'm remembering them wrong, weren't the worst offenders of QTE anyway. They were at least memorizable (meaning, the sequence was the same each time). The fight at the end, not to venture into spoiler territory, where the QTE shit was randomized was far, FAR worse. 

For the Wii is good because it's simple - messing around with the dpad for quicktime is beyond shitty.

Kinn, you need a new PS2.

GoW is a great game. 

"Barf Cum Dongs" and "Scumbag Frond" are both on the first page of results.

there's also "Scrag Mob Fund" 

The incarnation of productivity. 

I was browsing youtube for Left 4 Dead vids when I stumbled upon this pretty cool little walk-through video.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=atuZvbEPsAg

Its a complete remake of the shopping mall from the 2004 remake of "Dawn of the dead", and I must say the sheer size and attention to detail is very impressive.

Apparently the map is part of the Half-Life 2 modification called "No more room in hell" which you can find here : http://www.nomoreroominhell.com/?page=main

Braintastic! 

he's walked down 74'976'298.8819 roads?

The answer my freind is.... 

 

 

 

 

 

the answers is infact 74'976'298.8819.

Dummies.

OK, so HeadThump was very very close. I would definitely have rounded it up rather than down. 

if you watching where you were going you would have realized the partial is not a complete road but a mere gravel path that will lead to a upper middle class cul de sac of homes at some future date. So the answer is 74'976'298. 

I gave the benefit of the doubt that you or the subject of the analogy may have walked that path at some date in the past when it was indeed a road, but unfortunately the geographical schemata I found in the county records shows that the ground the path stretches across has never been developed for use. The Underurth Archives of the long dead Stenonychosaurus inequalis show they never developed that particular partial of land either, and a similar inquiry to previous BigFoot and alien inhabitants
came back with the same null results. Sorry. 

I swear it, you're wrong! It's zero.
I've re-thought my stance on the issue, and it has come clear to me now that the answer is definitely zero.
You see the man is quite capable of saying he had walked down any number of roads, regardless of the true figure. 

In almost any other circumstance where you didn't play upon a Bob Dylan lyric from his pre-psychedelic phase, I would fully and gladly state, 'you are CORRECT, sir!', however, you did choose a Bob Dylan lyric and therein lies the error in the application of the phrase 'before he can say', as you would like it to be read,and as it could be read without error outside the Dylan lexicon which you chose to appropriate. In the Dylan lexicon, this phrase like many of his others, given Dylan was a product of his time and he soaked up much of the culture, ideas and taboos of the Beats who were quite obsessed with the false, pretend, plastic lives of the 'gray flannel men' and who also wanted to live lives of authentic experience where one's language was plain spoken and the words coming from one's lips were true to the inner self, like a Dharma Bum, denotes a meaning of authenticity, in other words in Dylan speak, you cannot express 'before he can say' without it meaning what is simply expressed without lies or misdirection. Sorry, nice try though. 

we could be dealing with a dastardly liar who though familiar with Dylan is willing to misappropriate his words. In that case the answer, my friend, is not 'zero' because the question was never honestly asked, but 'null and void' instead. 

WTF retard topic is this?

Can we go back to debating dongs or some other intelligent discussion? 

beer for me!

or whatever which road he took?