 No, Than Is Right
#14102 posted by bambuz on 2008/04/25 12:49:19
I haven't had quicktime for years though as VLC can read that stuff. Qt is a travesty that tries to kill your computer as best as it can.
#14103 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/04/25 12:51:25
It kills Windows. It works great on Mac. :) Although I use VLC on my Mac as well just for convenience.
 Willem
#14104 posted by than on 2008/04/25 14:34:10
yeah, I know they are THE Mac company, but if you are going to release software at all, better at least try and get it right.
Surely they don't write bad Windows software on purpose?
 Bah
#14105 posted by Vigil on 2008/04/25 14:42:34
Nokia 5110 is the best phone ever released.
http://www.compxcell.co.za/images/nokia5110.gif
Even better battery life, [i]much[/i] more durable, and a better keypad that allows for faster messaging. And you can use the screen as a light.
It kills Windows. It works great on Mac. :) Although I use VLC on my Mac as well just for convenience.
Didn't you just reinforce his point? :)
Name me one OS that's good.
VigilOS is pretty great actually, and even better when you use WorldVigilRadiant (WVR) for mapping.
 Also
#14106 posted by Vigil on 2008/04/25 14:46:36
You can use your 5110 to stab people, and it's heavy enough to cause some damage when thrown. Like a CCW, only you can make calls with it.
 Apple Software On Windows
#14107 posted by SleepwalkR on 2008/04/25 14:57:27
blows. Not sure if it's intentional (doubt that). I guess the problem is that Apple generally has very small teams working on their software, and I don't believe that the Windows team is an exception.
#14108 posted by JneeraZ on 2008/04/25 15:18:37
"Surely they don't write bad Windows software on purpose?"
It wouldn't be surprising. Why spend a lot of time and effort making your competitors OS look more attractive?
#14109 posted by gone on 2008/04/25 15:36:50
hey, lits close this usless thread!
 Yeah But
#14110 posted by Orl on 2008/04/25 15:48:36
Doesn't Windows work hard to make Office work as best as it can for Mac?
I use Quicktime alternative by the way.
 Vigil
#14111 posted by bambuz on 2008/04/25 15:54:38
true.
5110 and 6110 are the classics. 3210 is the worst ever.
 Bleh
#14112 posted by JPL on 2008/04/25 16:18:25
Those phones must be consider as massive weapon of destruction, as they look more like coshes than phones :P
 Ungh!
#14113 posted by distrans on 2008/04/26 11:12:11
Just glanced down at my 3310 lovingly...
 Apple Pie
#14114 posted by bear on 2008/04/26 13:19:31
I doubt apple would make crappy windows software on purpose since all it does is making people doubt the quality of all their software regardless of platform. On the other hand if they made something good you might be more tempted to switch to mac based on your positive experience.
In the itunes case you can argue that the purpose of the windows version is just to be able to put windows support in the ipod boxes but since they're also porting things like Safari it seems very unlikely that they have some kind of deliberate crappy-win-software strategy.
 Safari/ITunes
#14115 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/04/26 17:14:13
Work OK on my comp, but its a pretty fast computer. ITunes was a real slow bastard of a program on my XP1700.
Thsi is they spend a lot of time makeing the windows versions look just like the mac versions instead of just using the native windows gui, which involves a lot of graphics which are unnecessary imho...
 Website What I Made:
#14116 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/04/26 17:19:35
http://www.lakescot.co.uk
it's gonna get re-made using tables instead of frames, cause it's not very search engine freindly at the moment.
OH well, my first website....
:E
(its for a company who sells feeds for dairy/beef animals)
 Safari
#14117 posted by steven_a on 2008/04/26 17:30:35
Dont know how it runs on Win, but all XP users can use the latest version of Safari. With Macs, you have to upgrade to the latest version of OSX before you can use the latest Safari. They're giving their own users the rough end of the stick sometimes.
Imho, OSX has solid design foundations (unix). Their kernel is a bit of a technological mess but is constantly being improved. Microsoft, on the other hand... are going backwards with the kernel, and never had a good overall design because of always ensuring compatibility.
Critcism against Apple about hardware reliability and small dev teams sounds fair to me though.
 Opera Mini
#14118 posted by Ijed on 2008/04/26 17:30:48
Posting from a nokia xpressmusic. Will have to wait and see how many times this hits the board
 RickyT23
#14119 posted by Spirit on 2008/04/26 17:52:17
Hint: Skip the tables part and go straight for proper webdesign (xhtml & css that is). You will get code much nicer to edit/read too. ;)
Do not use counters visible to visitors. Do not use javascript to display the current date to visitors (...). Infact, do not put stuff on the site just because you can.
The animated cow is most probably copyrighted and you do not want to use copyrighted stuff without permission on corporate websites.
The background image is way too big. You must keep dialup people in mind, especially for such a niche.
The fonts and colors are temporary I hope.
I would suggest using a custom google search instead of that picosearch one, as for many people "google = internet", thus they do know how to use and interpret it.
 Nice Advice Spirit!
#14120 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/04/26 18:59:44
Have have never had any training tin web-design. Completely self taught. I have come to realise a lot of my short comings after publishing that website. A lot of things only became obvious after posting it. When I started to try to "submit to google" and create a site-map it became obvious that the frames cripple the effectivness of the site straight away.
Im using css for the fonts/text style. My uncle was showing me last week that it can be used to actually format the page too! I thought it was only used for the text-styling! I can see straight away (now) that the benefit of using it for the actual layout is fantastic, and the desired website style is to have each page of information as a stand-alone page, with its own menus/links. It would be quicker to load, and google's robots would "see" the whole page. At the moment I think they see the root page (index.htm) which contains frame defenitions and not much else, and then miss the rest of the site. This is in the head:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=us-ascii" />
<meta name="revisit-after" content="35 days" />
<meta name="robots" content="all" />
<meta name="description" content=
"Lakeland-Scottish Feeds and Services are Agricultural Merchants ........ etc/>
<meta name="keywords" content=
"Lakeland-Scottish, Lakeland, Scott...... etc
I dont know if this will help things or not, but for starters I would have to update the list of keywords manually, it wouldnt be dynamic and most of the site is still missed...
So yeah - xhtml and css you say? Any where with detailed info, tutorials you might point me (I need to look anyway)...
(thanks btw)
:P
 Was Reading The News And Noticed That...
#14121 posted by Jago on 2008/04/28 03:31:03
Awesome, so Chicago just got more shooting deaths (31) over a single weekend than my entire country (Finland) does over a year. WTF.
 Jago
#14122 posted by bal on 2008/04/28 08:01:53
It's cause GTAIV was released, duh.
 Gun Control Debate
#14123 posted by SleepwalkR on 2008/04/28 08:04:29
now pls.
 No
#14124 posted by Vigil on 2008/04/28 10:14:09
Let's talk GTAIV instead.
 Comes Out Tommorrow Right?
#14125 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/04/28 10:18:01
Wander how long before the PC version does? I'll probably get the 360 version! (Cant believe it, the 360 I bought 25 months ago still works, I bought it with GTAIV in mind!)
Apparently you cant make yourself really fat in this one :(
 My Realism, Noooooooooooooooooo!
#14126 posted by czg on 2008/04/28 12:49:35
|