|
Posted by metlslime on 2002/12/23 18:24:21 |
Talk about anything in here. If you've got something newsworthy, please submit it as news. If it seems borderline, submit it anyway and a mod will either approve it or move the post back to this thread.
News submissions: https://celephais.net/board/submit_news.php |
|
 |
 Yes
#13877 posted by negke on 2008/03/23 10:33:02
But then again Quake mapping doesn't really allow for that much variation in gameplay (without QC). There are only few things one can do to break up the core formula of the game - killing monsters, reaching the exit. Quake wasn't made for more. People still play and map for it because of this simplicity (though I agree it does get boring after a while), so suggesting to switch to other games seems odd in this respect.
 Gameplay.
#13878 posted by Shambler on 2008/03/23 12:05:10
There is more potential for variety than some people might think. It just needs people to explore it.
 Remaking The Same Things Over And Over Again
#13879 posted by bear on 2008/03/23 12:42:28
I find it more depressing when I see "quake maps" in modern games.
Of course I'd like to see more creative stuff being done, it seems like there are still traces left in people from the formulaic years where many important lessons where learned but most of the wild creativity from the ancient times was lost.
 Yes Yes Yes
#13880 posted by Kinn on 2008/03/23 12:49:27
I'm aware that you can go nuts with QC and turn Quake into Mary Poppins' Magical Barnyard Funtime if you wanted. I suspect that the majority of people who are into Quake, and are still actively making content for it twelve(?) years down the line, are more often than not doing it out of a love of the original style and simplicity of the game (and the many custom levels that followed in this vein), and want to continue in that style.
Notice how in the early days, we saw a lot of crazy stuff and TCs - Quess, Quake Rally, wierd experimental levels etc. etc. Now I know you're not talking about doing full on TCs, but my point is that whilst Quake maps have got bigger, and pushed more and more the technical limits of what you can run in the engine, the gameplay in many ways has remained "conservative", more so than the experimental days of yore. I think this has less to do with a lack of imagination and inability to create new game concepts, and more to do with the deliberate decision to celebrate Quake for what it is primarily in terms of tone and simplicity of gameplay.
 Not Sure
#13881 posted by ijed on 2008/03/23 16:49:17
People arrive in the game by first playing maps, then they play mods - Zerstorer, OUM, Nehahra, SOE.
Some of my best Quake moments were things that broke from the formulae through using QuakeC, I was always just too lazy to learn and therefore attempt to emulate those greats.
But if everybody wants to keep doing the same old shit then why is Quoth so popular?
Nobody wants to make the same crap, a little bit better. Might sound odd since I'm working on a remake of ep3, but there you go.
How many puzzle levels, trap levels, horde levels have we seen?
Maybe that's another case of a million shades of brown.
 Yeah
#13882 posted by Tronyn on 2008/03/23 16:51:52
in the early days Quake was the only medium for a huge variety of people to do A-Z. Now the games industry allows basically any weird quirk to be its own game. As a consequence people who are working with Quake now generally just want to do Quake.
"Kill monster, leave"
I've played some great new FPS games (Far Cry, Dark Messiah of Might and Magic). Explain how these are different.
I like to think that maps where you see the whole layout (like Scragbait's Estate, Masque, and Marcher) provide the player with an aesthetic pleasure of completion that is significantly different from fighting monsters room after disconnected room.
I actually agree with plenty of your criticisms, but you have to accept Q1SP for what it is, which is an incredibly limited medium. Games in general are also incredibly limited. Books, for example, are a lot less limited.
 My Post
#13883 posted by bear on 2008/03/23 18:27:33
was only about the actual level design part and not about anything .qc or whatever.
 Gameplay Again.
#13884 posted by Shambler on 2008/03/23 19:02:27
I mean with Quake monsters, Quake weapons (not Quake engine limits though).
There is a lot of potential if people will explore it. Think what ijed did with Warpspasm, ignore the Quoth monsters for a mo and think about the size, the scale, the sheer relentlessness of it all. That was a new direction. There may be many more. Even some relatively normal maps show interesting ideas - look at Headthump's Zer map at the end - fighting monsters in lava with the clock ticking against you. That could be explored further...
 Eh
#13885 posted by megaman on 2008/03/23 19:44:05
what gameplay modifications do other fps games have? They basically just offer different enemy/map/weapon models.
even something like descent doesn't really exapnd on the doom gameplay much - it just has two more DOF.
And if you're hinting at 'do stuff there, fix this, get me person x here'-missions: those are all mostly trigger based ideas (that could - from a gameplay pov - easily be done in quake, too); also, they aren't really core game mechanics to me.
the stealth games might count as 'expand gameplay', but again, this is not MUCH more than clever triggers + compiler
 Oh
#13886 posted by megaman on 2008/03/23 19:45:23
right, quake lacks everything that's halfway dynamic, but that's just an engine thing, not gameplay.
 As A Hobbyist
#13887 posted by HeadThump on 2008/03/23 21:19:12
there are hundreds of ideas involving both game play and design have explored but have not released in any full maps. I'm posting these here instead of the new thread because most of these don't concern game play but design instead.
The Lava puzzle at the end of ZerTM_ht was a simplified version of an idea I once showed AquiRe involving a maze with a lava floor where you had to find sigils of protection and buttons that would raise a walkway around the maze. It is in one of the Mortisville maps, but too frustrating in its current implementation.
Other ideas --
One I demonstrated a while back, the idea of using a min light of 250 in the worldspawn entity and then using the light entities as deductive and additive brushes:
http://mortisville.quakedev.com/quake12.jpg
You do get a better since of control with the lighting with this method than standard lighting.
Another way of doing this would be to once again set min light to around 250 and paint on the lighting for each texture in its position in the level. Reuse of textures becomes severely limited, of course, and it is very time consuming.
Also, much more fun than the last method, is to separate out each room or area in a map, create five to ten thousand brushes worth of detail adding material textures without defining details, then go around the individually built maps and take screen shots that are the bases of the textures that you eventually use for the actual level. If you are careful with the lighting, this method can look extremely good.
Similar to this, I like to model in programs like Wings3d and Blender and take ray cast based shots of the models and use those as the basis of textures, like this one:
http://mortisville.quakedev.com/lamp3_5.jpg
 In Other News
#13888 posted by Vigil on 2008/03/24 00:56:33
The Quoth links on Signs of Koth are not working at this time.
 Crikey! You Turn Your Back For 2-3 Days...
#13889 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/24 18:02:25
...all hell breaks loose!
I dont know what to say.
Spirit - Your idea for 'testing engines' - you should look at my new map when it comes out later this week. r_speeds are quite high in places, but the map is within all standard limits and runs in software Quake. What we would need is an AguirRe style Kascam demo where somebody crazy (like AguirRe) runs around on god-mode, trying to create packet overflows.
Lunaran - Delighted to hear from you again. My comprehension of the technical workings of the Quake pallette is far inferior of yours. I ALMOST know what you mean. Infact I do know what you mean. Surely though, on a 32-bit rendering, a light with a color; (RGB 255 255 220) would not cause much of a detrimental effect, very little "muting". I admit that one must be carefull - especially when using light colours like (255 0 0).
I like the idea of using different subtle shades of yellow and blue to represent different types of electric light and sunlight, but without making them TOO yellow or TOO blue. Only slightly coloured lights.
I dunno. I've had fun playing, that's all I can say!
#13890 posted by tron on 2008/03/25 01:04:20
Where the fuck is Electro?
Bouncing around the country, back in Brisbane now.
That Mibbit is great, may have to poke around with it at lunchtime, the Telstra guy is coming to connect the phone line in a couple of weeks, then I can start organising getting internet connected.
Yay!
 OK, Where Is This Map?
#13891 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/25 15:33:04
celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=6035
It's not where its says it is, and because theres no link to a specific file, I cant search the filename...
It must be quite a good map, from reading the thread...
HELP PLEASE !
 Er, This Link:
#13892 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/25 15:34:59
 Put The H
#13893 posted by bambuz on 2008/03/25 15:35:11
ttp in front
 Google For "The Fistfucking Little Box"
#13894 posted by Spirit on 2008/03/25 15:57:27
 Thanks Spirit!
#13895 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/25 16:01:25
I didnt realize that was actually the name of the map!!
#13896 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/26 11:09:00
Tried out DarkPlacesMod last night, with Rygels high quality (2.7Gb) texture pack. It has, er, normal and gloss maps for most textures too.
I wanted to try it out with my new 8800 GTS 512.
Start wouldnt load, neither would E1M1, I think due to a lack of memory. I wasnt using the picmip command.
But The Fistfucking Little Box loaded fine, due to a small amount of textures used for the map. And I must say mod and map together = more eyecandy than I could get my head round. I nearly cried at all of the beauty.
High res bump-mapping (OK, not quite bumpmapping) in Quake - un-necessary indeed, along with the RTLighting, but, well, I thought it looked good! :F
 Ricky
#13897 posted by ijed on 2008/03/26 13:15:37
Normal mapping is like advanced bump mapping.
 Is It? Oh, Well...
#13898 posted by RickyT33 on 2008/03/26 13:39:03
I dont really understand it. But it looked cool!
Looks better than the Tenebrae effect, anyway, but I guess thats to do with actual increase in texture resolution.
I quite like the look of just the highres textures in other engines, but Darkplaces *looks* the most impressive with all of the bells and whistles running, in dpmod. Just a shame it wont load big maps that way.
It is silly really! I mean I might as well go and play UT3.
 Try
#13899 posted by ijed on 2008/03/26 13:49:12
Wikipedia and look up relief mapping - it's what they used in Quake4 so that a flat surface can occlude itself, interesting reading.
If you're into that sort of thing ;)
 Ricky
#13900 posted by bambuz on 2008/03/27 02:34:49
I think I've heard you can knock down Rygel's highest textures to about half size and don't notice about any change in quality.
Don't remember so well anymore.
 I'm Back
#13901 posted by inertia on 2008/03/27 07:30:16
Delegate zero says hello.
|
 |
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
|
Website copyright © 2002-2025 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.
|
|