Submitting News
#1334 posted by Jago on 2009/08/17 05:43:19
When submitting news, aren't you supposed to get a message saying something among the lines of "Thanks for your submission" etc?
I just tried submitting some news, and in both IE8 and Firefox 3.5, it would just throw me to the main Forum menu after clicking the Submit button.
Jago:
#1335 posted by metlslime on 2009/08/17 10:31:33
i'm actually not sure what's supposed to happen, i forgot how i coded it. A confirmation message is probably a good idea though.
I ended up with 4 submissions from you :)
#1336 posted by necros on 2009/08/24 19:33:33
have you changed something recently? the address bar used to have the post # of the first post visible in the bar, so you could change it to jump to whatever post # you wanted to. now, all it does is show:
http://www.celephais.net board/forum.php (replace space with /) no matter what you're looking at.
Worksforme
#1337 posted by Spirit on 2009/08/24 19:39:51
Are you using Opera? If you have focus on the address bar (eg cursor in it), it will not change even if you click on links.
Firefox 3.5.2
#1338 posted by necros on 2009/08/24 20:20:25
and my cursor isn't on the address bar
Hmmm...
#1339 posted by metlslime on 2009/08/24 23:06:21
I haven't changed anything...
maybe its a misguided attempt to show you only the webpage's filename and not the querystring which they consider confusing and complicated?
Works Here
#1340 posted by Jago on 2009/08/25 01:06:39
FF 3.5.2 here and I see the entire full URL, in the case of right now: http://www.celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=2&start=1336
But a bug I just noticed: If I take a full URL, like the one above and put it inside the quote tags, this is what happens:
http://www.celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=2&start=1336
Nor link doesn't work neither does it get fully displayed as a quoted text.
Jago:
#1341 posted by metlslime on 2009/08/25 02:54:47
good catch, i'll have to figure out how to fix that.
#1342 posted by necros on 2009/08/25 02:56:22
well, it's not doing it anymore. i'm not sure why it was before, but it must just be been a momentary glitch on my side.
Many, But Not All, Names Are White In Opera 10
#1343 posted by grahf on 2009/09/03 02:59:34
I just noticed that most people's nicks are white, when I know they should have a color. I don't recall this happening in the earlier betas of Opera 10, just the release candidate and final. On a mac by the way... but Firefox and Safari have no problem.
The following nicks, just from the last 50 posts are white: mine, metlslime, rickyt23, spirit, JPL, inertia, Jago, Pulsar, onetruepurple.
I would guess that Opera doesn't like certain weird RGB combinations? Are there perhaps style options I should change to get around this?
Opera 10 Bug
#1344 posted by inertia on 2009/09/03 05:35:13
Grahf's color bug doesn't occur in Opera 10.00, Ubuntu Jaunty Jizz
All Fine Here Too
#1345 posted by Spirit on 2009/09/03 08:29:55
Maybe it is an Apple feature because white is trendy? ;)
Check if the visited links are set to white in Preferences -> Web Pages. And make sure you did not enable some style/mode/layout.
Fine Here Too
#1346 posted by megaman on 2009/09/03 23:00:54
Oh
#1347 posted by megaman on 2009/09/03 23:01:39
i think if you switch on fit to width, it enables some mode that takes care of bad colour contrasts , too
Oh...
#1348 posted by metlslime on 2009/09/03 23:16:45
meaning it is disabling colored text when the color doesn't contrast against the background sufficiently?
#1349 posted by necros on 2009/09/04 00:42:40
but, for example, JPL uses bright red, surely that contrasts enough?
Oh Weird
#1350 posted by grahf on 2009/09/04 06:46:56
Megaman was right. "Fit to Width" was causing the problem. Never would have guessed that.
Metlslime
#1351 posted by megaman on 2009/09/04 10:47:42
yeah, it's modifying the colour then.
When I'm Away For A While...
#1352 posted by mwh on 2009/09/11 10:26:52
... and don't read func (because, say, I'm on honeymoon) it's hard to catch up because (particularly) the permanent threads have like 300 posts and there's no way to only read some of them. If I click the "new 300" link, they all get marked as read.
I guess I should just get over this and not read 300 posts of mostly pointless bickering, but have you thought about making this easier, maybe paging through new posts 25 at a time or something?
Mwh:
#1353 posted by metlslime on 2009/09/11 11:07:27
i haven't really thought of that, but it might be doable. Currently the "unread" status is per-thread, not per post -- each thread stores the highest-numbered post you've seen, and so if the post count is higher than that, it means you have unread posts.
Since viewing only the first page of "new" posts would only bump up that "highest read post" up by 25 (if you have 25 to a page) then it would correctly remember that you haven't read them all yet, if you get interrupted and don't actually get a change to read all the pages of new posts.
Grrr Metl
#1354 posted by Spirit on 2009/10/09 09:39:36
Please fix the special character -> html entity code so they are not html encoded again when you pull them from the db (guessing).
It should display the character not the HTML code.
You HTML-卍!
Test
#1355 posted by anonymous user on 2009/11/14 13:25:18
Links
#1356 posted by negke on 2009/11/15 10:00:45
The links to the PQ review sites are dead. You should probably change them to Spirit's mirrors.
Ah...
#1357 posted by metlslime on 2009/11/15 10:09:26
yes, good idea
#1358 posted by Spirit on 2009/11/15 10:21:43
There are no Spirit's mirrors yet, sorry. Quakewiki.net is someone else and he was not cooperative.
|