News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
General Abuse
Talk about anything in here. If you've got something newsworthy, please submit it as news. If it seems borderline, submit it anyway and a mod will either approve it or move the post back to this thread.

News submissions: https://celephais.net/board/submit_news.php
First | Previous | Next | Last
 
yeee congtz for 5 years underworldfan and thks for the reviews!

if my english were better i�m sure i whould help you out with reviews... but you guys now my English skills :)

poor... 
Werl 
I'd say everyone here is very grateful for the work you're doing, UWF + Tronyn. You're the only review site left, basicly.

As to the scores . . . do whatever the hell you want; it's your party. I was very happy to get an 18 for that pack I made, but in retrospect, to me at least, the number is distracting from the review. 
Also 
Just checking the updated site - with screenshots on the main page it's better, thanks :)

And happy anniversary! 
 
Something to ponder though... is it a coincidence that neither of the top Quake review sites (Ramshackle and TEAMShambler) had a scoring system?

Well, of the original "top Quake review sites" (SPQ Level Heaven, Crash's Quake Pages, Talon's Strike) two of them had numeric scores and one didn't. (SPQ heaven just said "if it's on this site, it's worth downloading" kind of like shambler did.) 
Also... 
isn't it weird that "newcomer" websites like UWF and func are now 5 years old, which means they have been around for half of the entire history of the quake community? 
Talon's Strike 
Yes, but Talon's Strike gave every level over 90 points out of 100, with a two sentence review. It was barely an archive of maps.

I visited that site religiously. 
Also 
Note that I can't remember the exact scoring system Talon used. Feel free to correct me. 
Vigil: 
most maps recieved between 80 and 95, though I think it's partly because he didn't include any maps that really sucked. So it was still somewhat inflated (if he scored all maps in existence the range would probably be like 50-95.) 
Metl 
A fine point, and well made! It would have been more appropriate to say that the sites I mentioned were my favourite sites, rather than arrogantly assuming that this automatically means they must be regarded as the best sites.

I guess everything has to be considered in context, but it is impossible to predict what might be coming up in the future. It's like map reviews - give something a 10 today, something better comes along tomorrow... and then everyone is complaining about the relative scoring of the maps. :D

Also, I just noticed that this post creation dialogue has a rather long undo queue... surprising, and very nice. 
Frib: 
I actually agree that TEAMShambler was the best SPQ site during the time it operated. I'm actually just making the point that there was an earlier era where there were different sites in operation. 
D2SP: The City Of The Damned - Apocalypse 
http://www.realm667.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=466
Dark GZDoom map with unusual gameplay by Tormentor667 (so it's probably nice but hard). 
Thank You Metl & Frib 
Kind comments. Even if I agree with them ;).

Lack of scoring wasn't fundamental to TEAMShambler's success. Timing, dedication and dilligence were.

I think scoring is fine in theory but doesn't work in practise because firstly you're assigning something fixed to what are at least partially artistic creations and mutually incomparable let alone unscorable, and secondly the system breaks down after a while because the system relies on comparison but comparability changes over time.

Not that I have any real complaints with UWF using scores, if he thinks it helps. 
Personnaly 
I think UWF review comments are the thing to take care of: what's in the map is so far what is intersting to know isn't it ?
The scores highlight UWF personal feeling of the map, even if the scoring / ranking process has some rules to respect. At least it gives a comparison point between several maps... 
Where's The Music? (quake 2) 
i bought the quake4 special edition since its at the same price as the normal version (why not have the normal cheaper? gah?).

anyway, playing quake2 w/ expansions and because they all came on a dvd, there is nom usic! and its pretty boring without it! i have the quake2 cd from when it came out, but man, is there a place where i can download the tracks for both expansion packs?

btw, the reckoning is pretty cool so far :) 
Dunno Where It Is 
Quake music would be nice too! I downloaded my copy of Quake straight from ID's website and that came with no music!! Shame cause the original quake music rocked!!! I could burn a disk if I could download the tracks ;) 
Quake1 Music Is Everywhere... 
at least, i remember seeing torrents with the mp3s whenever i looked for some live nin songs :)

so if you know how to get songs that way (who doesnt?), then it wouldn't be so hard to find somebody that has them. 
 
http://www.celephais.net/board/view_thread.php?id=1&start=12635&end=12635
It's also available in mp3 at some blog for ages now, try google. 
Be-ee-ay-ootifull! 
 
What About... 
...the ones for the quake2 expansion packs? i dont think i like those links :( 
Interesting... 
...so I saw this SP release called 'badpak' at quaddicted and thought I'd check it out. The rating was 'excellent' for an unfinished map series with some only partially complete resources. "How odd", I mused.

Intrigued, I downloaded it and for sure, if you can suspend dislike for the partially complete heavy/flying/sng/enforcer, this really is an excellent piece of work. Some minor annoyance at things like lightning models not lining up with the guns end fades rapidly in the face of great brushwork and immersive combat.

No "bad" pak this one :) 
Teamshambler Had That 
not for review but linked to it from memory. Cant remember the name of the mapper but it was one of spawny' friends?? 
It Was... 
http://teamshambler.planetquake.gamespy.com/rev000904.html

Ironhammer. As you say, one of Nano's spanish crew. 
There Is Also 
an unofficial fifth map Ih1m5, as well as a few others which use Badpak's base monsters. 
 
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/3465/splashgl7.png
I am pretty speechless.
Normally something like this would be called a security breach or exploit.

"hey, we got that exploit in our jpeg loader, so don't watch custom jpegs"

Well, obviously an attempt to make gamers BUY addon things instead of STEALING custom made stuff from the internet, is it? 
. . . 
Unsolicited Advice makes up a huge fraction of what annoys me in this world.

Even an application pop up window that states a simple: Would you like to go on line to find an application to open this file(Recommended)? makes me want to strangle the programmer who dared to put advisory material in an ap I'm using. 
First | Previous | Next | Last
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
Website copyright © 2002-2025 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.