Yeah
#101 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/10/27 01:58:03
I aint buying anything for my PC (except for a possible new case) until the next gen NVidia cards come out. The market should shift, everything get a bit cheaper etc. Then it will be worth getting a DirectX 11 card.
Must admit though, the new Radeon 5870 does look mighty decent.
I have been flirting with the idea of getting a new GPU for a while now, but it really wouldnt be worth it. But I really wouldnt like to have anything worse than about an NVidia 7800 at the moment. My 8800GTS 512Mb is pretty much exactly the same as a 9800GTX. And I cant really justify upgrading it until new cards get a bit faster and cheaper.
But I will be wanting a DX11 card for the tesselation and better anti-ailiasing stuff. And more power. NEED MORE POWERRRRRRRR!!!
Ricky, You Might Be Waiting For A While
#102 posted by grahf on 2009/10/29 16:10:34
Nvidia completely droppped the ball on getting their next-gen (gt300) parts released on time. I'd expect a paper launch and no actual silicon to be seen until early next year.
But, DX11 will be very important... once a majority of gamers have cards that support the features. We're entering the era of fully-generalized GPU computing, which will mean not just better graphics, but things like physics and AI offloaded to our gpus. It's exciting, but I worry that it won't catch on in a big way until the next generation of consoles. PC games are stuck for now at the lowest common cross-platform denominator.
It's
#103 posted by ijed on 2009/10/29 16:46:25
Always the way, taking alot of time to move to the next jump.
Yeah
#104 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/10/29 17:10:16
I know! Theres been a lot of talk and rumour about NVidia's <2% yeilds of the new chips and what have you. Some people are saying it will be March next year before we see their next load of cards. And the new ATI/AMD cards (5870/5850) are mighty fine looking cards. But at the moment ATI/AMD have the market cornered. The 11.5 inch long 5870X2 will surface soon also.
The new NVidia cards will be faster than the ATI ones when they finaly do come out, which will force the market into another price war (yay!) and that is when I will reconsider buying a new card. My current card runs most new titles with pretty high settings at 1920*1080, so it doesst make sense to replace it yet. I can live without 8xAntiAliasing and DirectX10/11 shaders for a few more months I think ;)
Now Is Just A Bad Time To Be An Nvidia Fanboy
#105 posted by grahf on 2009/11/07 23:37:03
Linux UT3 Officially Dead
It's a little bit old, but news to me.
Also over at phoronix, they've been harping on about Steam for Linux is a cert for ages now... but i'll believe it when i see it.
My Comp
#108 posted by ranger on 2010/10/07 08:26:35
3.5 GB RAM
125 GB HD
XP Media Center
Creative X-Fi
Nvidia 8600 GTS
Dual Core
best of all, it was only $1200!!!
Also
#109 posted by ranger on 2010/10/07 08:35:05
XP's far from perfect but is the best OS MS ever made - vista's a memory hog to say the least, and 7 is a compatability problem filled nightmare (and memory hog)
Eh?
#110 posted by bal on 2010/10/07 10:27:26
When did you buy that computer? $1200 sounds expensive for that nowadays.
Hell
#111 posted by Vigil on 2010/10/07 12:14:00
$1200 sounds expensive even if it's three years old.
#112 posted by Trinca on 2010/10/07 12:25:35
best OS is W7, since I have it no problems at all...
more then 12 month with same (no format and reinstall) OS and is something new to me!
no blue screens, don't crash don't get stuck...
finally Windows is almost like Linux!
#113 posted by negke on 2010/10/07 12:27:19
finally Windows is almost like Linux!
FUCKING LOL
TBF Windows 7 Seems Good To Me
#114 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/10/07 12:31:20
But I've never used Linux (except for things which use Linux like Jukeboxes, Aeroplane TV's etc) or OSX to compare it to.
Best Windows yet though. And Windows XP takes some beating.
Bought It 5.5 Years Ago
#115 posted by ranger on 2010/10/07 12:32:21
#116 posted by Trinca on 2010/10/07 12:33:10
LOL why?
talking about problems... not look...
linux don't give much problems and windows use to.. That was what I meant.
FUCKING LOL NOOB :P
XP
#117 posted by RickyT33 on 2010/10/07 12:35:24
Looks like a person laughing with their tongue out :)-|-<
They should have called it "Windows HaHaNaNaNaNaNaaaa-Na!"
Ive Alwas Thought The Same Thing
#118 posted by meTch on 2010/10/07 17:08:11
accept it was lip music
XP:BBBBURRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIP
OS X Yosemite
Looks more than a little retarded to me. But thats ok - gives me an excuse to hop off the OS treadmill Apple have been having recently.
Are they really trying to make a desktop OS look like a mobile device.
Does anyone like/tried it ?
Tried To Install It
Fried my system. First time this has happened to me with Mac OS X. Not a great first impression.
#121 posted by Baker on 2014/10/18 01:56:03
Hmmm? I didn't plan on installing immediately any way, but slightly disturbed ...
#122 posted by ericw on 2014/10/18 02:12:08
It took a few hours to install for me, apparently there's an installer bug where if you have files in /use/local (i.e. homebrew), it takes forever :-/
I like the more minimal look though.
Hows it going ? I cant see that there's been too many huge bugs. Any impressions about the new font.
Fresh Install
Works fine for me. Nothing big is broken. New font is clearly optimized for retina display and looks a bit shit on some external monitors. Can't really complain apart from the shitty upgrade installer.
Hmm
Some forum post
Can't imagine Steve Jobs would have approved of using Helvetica/Arial. Of course Helvetica a serviceable font. It's a no-brainer font for non-designers. Can't understand why Apple would use it. They could have designed or commissioned a unique font. Now my web browser text, email text, printed reports off my laser printer, user manuals, basic PDF's, and basic documents all have the SAME FONT as the menu bar and system. From an affordance and usability perspective, the system font should be distinctive.
|