Could particles be cached in their current state (i.e. paused/frozen), when out of view and then resumed when in view? 

2. makestatic was a vanilla thing. I've not touched it. I probably should do for extra fields, but that would mean that I'd have to actually add support for that.
either way, if the corpse isn't moving then the protocol changes mean that it'll only be retransmitted when it first appears/disappears, there's actually little need for makestatic now.

use tracebox to see if its sitting on a lift or something. or failing that a traceline. or just check thecorpse.groundentity

3. that's in this build, it probably ought to stick to a single packet due to burst, but I didn't include any prioritisation for players and skipping the player every other packet would make it a bit too jerky without better lerping, so it just spams.

4. those solid skys that give particle effects when shot, that affects some percentage of the vanilla maps.

5. so one tracelines and projectiles will hit corpses and yet monsters and players will just walk through them.

6. dpmod is one such mod. go on, get it to run in markv or something. 

"Why do I constantly feel like there's something I've forgotten to do?"

Everyone forgets to add support for 4 players and splitscreen... (FTE doesn't count cause I cant get it to work properly) 

I asked Gunter if he'd be willing to give your Spikespasm a test drive as a replacement for ProQuake server on his coop mod server fvf.servequake.com

I explained the benefits like the automatic server browser.

Something that immediately occurred to me, though ...

1) Quakespasm can't actually serve a protocol 15 game (i.e. standard Quake). The sign-on packet wrongly busts the standard Quake limit, causing the client to immediately disconnect.

2) Gunter asked if it would have ProQuake rcon. I said I'd bring that up.

/I could probably easily obtain more server operator volunteers, but Gunter has run a server for a while and he's already getting familiar with Quakespasm. ;-) 

I didn't make it clear: He said he'd be willing

I explained the single port server advantage, the ipv6 support, and automatic server heartbeat advantages.

(Although Polarite is the one actually in control of the server. I haven't talked to Polarite yet.) 

RCON

* To anyone that doesn't know what RCON is, if someone has a server, the owner can connect to the server and do "rcon changelevel e1m3" from the client.

It is a way to give yourself the ability to issue console commands to the server like change the map. 

I had the idea to make low lying fog using a skip-textured 32 unit high brush whose top surface was textured with a circular fuzzy edged {fogtexture (using pink transparency index), setting this brush to be func_illusionary, and topping it off with a .alpha value of like 0.2 or 0.3 for subtlety.

This looks somewhat passable at 0.7 even, however there is a bug. I can't set .alpha lower than 0.67 or else it doesn't draw the face at all.

??? 

@FifthElephant, as much as I enjoy encouraging people to use fte, this probably isn't the right topic. poke me on irc or give a proper bug report in the afterquake topic or something.

@Baker, it'd be good to get it to use vanilla-compatible packet sizes, at least where practical. The signon buffer size can trivially be reduced to 8000 now thanks to baselines being splurged over multiple packets too, but iirc there's issues when recording demos mid-map due to clientside assumptions someone made, and I'm too lazy to re-splurge the data back out there too (so I just left it using large signons despite it being trivial to split it, to try to sidestep the issue), either way I suspect its not just quakespasm that would have an issue with that.
iirc, vanilla needs 1024-byte unreliables too, which is more of an issue without proper deltas, though I suppose if you're trying to use vanilla protocols then you get what you deserve. Obviously none of these limitations need apply to qs[s] clients connecting to the same server... Can we not just get everyone to upgrade?.. :P
The master thing is kinda irrelevant as not many clients will bother to check it at this time anyway, so he'll still need to manually get it added to whatever server listings proquake etc currently use.

@Qmaster, the engine sets up the alphatest value once and then forgets about it:
glAlphaFunc(GL_GREATER, 0.666);
that line needs to scale by the entity's alpha value in each place where its actually needed, which is probably quite a few places. 

>Can we not just get everyone to upgrade?.. :P

Protocol 15 is what DarkPlaces, Qrack, Super 8 and everything else can speak. And your single port server means that no client --- not even GLQuake will have NAT issues.

It was my thought to get the server real live tested, since few people (or even anywhere) here seem to coop even on a LAN.

And then after that works, push for a "Spikespasm coop server" that exclusively uses the new client.

/That was my line of thinking. 

(Anyway, I wasn't trying to get you to do anything of substance. I made Mark V support protocol 15 with just a couple of tweaks, I wasn't aware that getting "Spikespasm" to support protocol 15 would be difficult.) 

( When I made Mark V support protocol 15 -- which FitzQuake 0.85 never quite did --- I just kept track of the protocol upon map start and set a global. I adjusted the signon buffer and then the packet size. http://forums.insideqc.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5593 ) 

haze.cfg --- assigned the te_quad_sparkfan effect to progs/quaddama.mdl

Loaded dm3

When I pull up the console. The effect spams continually. Obvious the "die" time cannot happen when the console is up. But new particles shouldn't spawn.

Oddly this does not seem to happen with rain/snow. So far only te_quad_sparkfan seems to have this problem. 

Baker, protocol 15 might be the only commonality between all engines, but if you ignore vanilla, all the other engines have boosted what their engines are willing to receive to at least ethernet's limits.
requiring everyone to upgrade basically includes to every single notable engine with the exceptions of vanilla and proquake. One of which you(baker) can fix with a new revision.
The alternative is to cripple dp,qrack,fitzquake,markv,etc clients that give no way to identify what they support.
These clients would also need to be limited to 600 entities too, etc.
Its not that its a big change, its more that its really limiting. 

I think what've you done here is incredible as is.

Spike: you(baker) can fix with a new revision.

Heheheheh. Should the day ever come when I have time, hehe ;) Probably won't be within the next 12 months.

No one expected to get particles because you seemed down on it. The stuff on top of the particles was unexpected and a bonus.

The particle stuff by itself is quite the enhancement and I hope it gets put to good use by Sock and possibly others. 

if I'm not critical of something, I can't easily spot the flaws in it.
At the end of the day, if someone does something stupid with the particle system then that's their own damn fault, and not something that should hold back eg Sock.

Regarding protocol 15, if clients can tell the server that its not crippleware, then its only the crippleware engines that will suffer from being crippleware.
I made some tweaks, and r4 will (bug-willing) do protocol 15 properly. I even made it reduce the number of usable sounds/models if the serverinfo packet is too big, which seemed to get AD going with a proquake client, although it did feel a little empty with half the entities missing (like I said, limiting)...
I guess I also ought to do something about makestatic too now though. Stupid cans of worms... :(
Also got the server part of proquake-compatible-rcon working, although I wouldn't personally recommend using it because the password is still sent as plain text, which sucks.
Also found a nice reliable way to crash proquake servers. Hurrah.

yay polish?.. 

Question:

I don't understand your objection to the FitzQuake "game travail" or "game warp -quoth"

Is it because it doesn't use gamedir like Quakeworld and DarkPlaces and JoeQuake? I used to dislike the slightly different naming, but I've gone from disliking it to prefering it because I type it in the console a lot for single player.

Is your dislike just because the name? Or is there something else I'm not seeing?

/Slightly surprised you decided to do the protocol 15 thing, I did look through all the mega-tons of changes you did and I can see your POV. rcon on the other hand is barely a cut and paste, relatively speaking ... even easy stuff is slight PITA. 

until some rcon command crashes the server and fails to even tell the (rcon) user what happened. Blind copy+paste is never a good idea.
no feedback on errors = bad
plain text passwords = bad
client only supporting one rcon command at a time even when its just a single packet = bad
modifying the system-specific code for something common to all = bad
willingness to exceed proquake's own mtu resulting in 'bad read' errors instead of results = bad
not giving any feedback at all when the server is a listen server = bad
copy+paste = bad. :)


I dislike 'game' because it differs from the command name that id themselves used with quakeworld. that said, quake2 used 'game' so I can't really justify that much further (although q2 used a cvar, which has its own set of issues, which an engine that also supports q2 needs to be able to deal with).
What I really *really* hate about it is the '-quoth' part, which limits it to only a few base-mods that are hardcoded into the engine. This also affects the choice of hud, and even the network protocol. Each of those 3 things are unacceptable to me.
So yeah, I feel justified in disliking it, even if I ignore that qw+fte even existed.
The deltas stuff deals with the protocol change. The hud lumps can be auto-detected. The hardcoded list of 'permitted' mission-packs is just plain stupid. Oh, and quakespasm doesn't support more than those 2(+id1) either.
But yes, I should do something about the server announcing the correct gamedir to use, but probably I'll just leave that until someone else wants to actually fix up the 'game' mess and add auto-downloads and deal with the versioning fallout resulting from that. 

Scenario:

Someone is using DarkPlaces as a listen server.
They decide to coop.
They use multi-game dir for replacement content.

Problems:
(1) So does the client need to download all of that person's replacement content when connecting?
(2) Make sure content are the right models with CRC check etc? How do you do that when the loaded model is a replacement model?
(3) Download doesn't download the replacement textures that the replacement content needs to look right.

Multiple gamedir support is mostly a mechanism for using replacement content.

Within that context --- the support for a small set of mods (rogue, hipnotic, quoth, possibly -ad in the future) is not much of a problem.

And is probably a major benefit. I don't know how many single player users require the Quake Injector to play a custom map, but its probably no small number.

When I first wanted to try custom single player, I was not used to the installation instructions or using -game in the command line. Figuring out where things go and the startup procedure is a big challenge to most people.

Shorter version: I think a finite list of double gamedir like "game -quoth" is fine, Preach knows what's he's doing, Sock knows what he's doing ... other than Preach and Sock and some of the power mappers that really know their stuff (czg, necros, tronyn, etc.) --- there aren't a lot of people that are going to be making an expansion pack level add-on for immersive content.

When DarkPlaces added double-gamedir support, the thought wasn't of "hey, make sure feature is properly architected and well designed" but rather for modder convenience. 

IIRC the only reason for -quoth is to allow it to support the Hipnotic HUD, together with Quoth content, together with an (optional) additional gamedir for a mod which requires Quoth.

-quoth is just a hack, in other words. But it's a hack that the community has come to accept and expect.

This is clearly a "survival of the unfittest" situation. A simple-to-implement, adequately robust, but not necessarily full featured solution will always win over an elegant, extensible, more correct solution but that is significantly more difficult to implement. 

EF_STARDUST in the DarkPlaces source looks nearly identical to EF_FLAME, except that it uses pt_static instead of pt_flame.

Is EF_STARDUST needed for a model to emit, say, sparks?

Is or EF_STARDUST redundant because the same effect can already be achieved through other means? Hence its non-inclusion in "Spikespasm".

/I'm looking at smc and thinking about extracting an effect or of it for a tutorial later in the week or on the weekend. 

its either '-quoth' in an engine that hardcoded a specific mod, or '-hipnotic -game quoth' for vanilla, but yeah iiuc its just for the hud.
DP didn't add 'double-gamedirs', it has multiple gamedirs, because limits suck. As does FTE. of course, when you have more than one, order matters. I handled 'game foo -quoth' by parsing the list twice and then re-ordering. And if you want to mess everything up for everyone, all you have to do is to put a space in the subdirectory name! yay!

EF_STARDUST is what exactly?.. Its a specific effect that you wouldn't have a clue what it really looks like until you've actually used it so that you can see. I don't see the point of it because its a specific effect. Its just not significant compared to the more generic stuff like r_effect or traileffectnum.
Iiuc, it predates custom effects and stuff, dating back to the time of hardcoded effects. Same with all the extra TE_ effects.
Yeah, it might be simple enough to rename it to 'ef_customeffect1' or something lame, but that's just lame.
So yeah, you might want it for compatibility, but moving beyond that its probably not very useful, so I didn't see the point of implementing it. 

If I remember correctly, it's an effect used on slipgates that displays star-like sparkles floating upwards. I don't think it would do for, say, electric sparks coming from a broken panel. 

That's what I thought! (It's obsolete, artifact from more primitive days). Thanks!

@mugwump - the particle system lets you set the origin and the velocity and other things. the originoffset could be instead of above it could be to the side and instead of sparkles, sparks. It's just an emitter. 

Simple effect videos

1) Sparkle: https://youtu.be/9TWUVe2_T3c
2) Smoke: https://youtu.be/K4iyK6yW8bw
3) Flame: https://youtu.be/ZH9zMBCyRFw
4) Myst: https://youtu.be/YXRx6sr-H4k
5) Rocket Trail: https://youtu.be/mOE71jc0RtI
6) Decal: https://youtu.be/3mRtTRSOKeE
7) Model Light: https://youtu.be/L8QX0TuTLTw

To be followed up maybe this weekend by tutorials. 

Hey there,
I recently dug around a bit trying to find out how to get some popular source ports including Quakespasm to look as close to the original DOS Quake as possible. Changing texturemode, particles, lerpmove, lerpmodels, etc. one can get Quakespasm to look nearly identical, but the weapon offset is still problematic, it's just too low. Using scr_ofsx gets you somewhat closer, but it's not ideal. I've seen that Tarvis/bangstk made some effort here earlier this year to change that with an unofficial fork, but I guess that wouldn't work for the most recent release. Or can that somehow still be included without official support?

Otherwise, is there any way to change the weapon offset to really get the original look, or isn't that possible right now? And if it isn't, can anybody give me some insight into why exactly that change is there in the first place?
Thanks :)