#1579 posted by necros [174.113.119.133] on 2012/04/12 23:18:28
 Never Wikia
#1580 posted by onetruepurple [91.233.197.107] on 2012/04/12 23:20:49
 A Company Wants To Make Money!?
#1581 posted by ijed [186.37.202.215] on 2012/04/13 01:15:17
haven't checked it out though. If its a genuinely bad layout and awkward to use people will prefer a better one.
The reasoning laid out sounds more like a personal fued. Which is fine, although the reasoning sounds a bit naive.
 Fuck Wikia
#1582 posted by Spirit [89.204.130.199] on 2012/04/13 08:48:04
why would you let a company make money off your work?
 DoomWiki Moved Away Too
#1583 posted by negke [31.18.185.232] on 2012/04/13 11:28:18
 To Host It For Free?
#1584 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2012/04/13 17:47:02
But it's a fine line, and I haven't investigated the thing.
#1585 posted by Spirit [80.171.159.92] on 2012/04/13 17:58:50
Func is free!
Quaddicted is free!
Oh wait, you are all being sold!
Your mod will be free right?
All those hours.
If one cares, one invests time and money into providing something to others for free.
#1586 posted by Spirit [80.171.159.92] on 2012/04/13 18:00:41
And often you yourself get a benefit off it too. God, I hated having to use Fileplanet and other "login and wait 2 minutes" money-makers for map downloads...
Oh look, all the ad-supported hosted sites on Planetquake.com were deleted. Oops! Who tells you Wikia gives a fuck about your content if it is not profitable?
Disclaimer: I am one of those Archiveteam zealots.
 Metl
#1587 posted by onetruepurple [91.233.197.107] on 2012/04/18 18:17:27
How about an approval process for discussion threads, just as there is for news threads?
 That's A Good Idea
#1588 posted by Kinn [86.129.254.31] on 2012/04/18 20:01:51
as well as getting rid of spam threads, it means we hopefully won't get any shitstorms like that fiend mod/cyst popping palava. Considering how strict the rules supposedly are for discussion threads, it seems odd that there is literally no restrictions on posting them.
 That's A Bad Idea
#1589 posted by negke [31.18.185.232] on 2012/04/18 20:23:47
What kind of forum would that be...
The moderators simply need more power - an option to mark posts as spam and delete (or hide) threads. This shouldn't be hard to implement.
#1590 posted by onetruepurple [91.233.197.107] on 2012/04/18 20:32:17
What kind of forum would that be...
One without (X) Deleted threads!
 ...
#1591 posted by Shambler [86.25.222.132] on 2012/04/18 21:10:08
Moderated new threads with options to Publish / Reject into Thread X/y/z / Reject as spam, would seem sensible to me. It would mean a slight delay to threads but since they are supposed to be long term discussion threads I think that would be okay?
 Maybe...
#1592 posted by Shambler [86.25.222.132] on 2012/04/18 21:12:10
Up the number of sticky threads to be a nice round 10? To have some more useful stickies so that people can get their questions answered more readily...
How about:
Modding/coding help.
Custom engine help.
Modelling help/screenshots/etc.
???
#1593 posted by negke [31.18.185.232] on 2012/04/18 21:21:33
Potentially, it would reduce the incentive to create a discussion thread even more. The "slight" delay may easily be several hours, judging from how the approval of news threads works at the moment (either in the morning or the evening func-time, rarely in between).
The current amount of spam certainly doesn't justify such drastic measures, in my view.
 Stickies
#1594 posted by Kinn [86.129.254.31] on 2012/04/18 21:24:26
- coding help
- modelling help
- "other games"
Note: I still think the current separation of "other PC games" from "other console games" is retarded considering that most of the games talked about in the PC thread are just bloody console ports anyway.
#1595 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2012/04/18 21:25:29
I think my first step will be adding moderator powers, without requiring approval (so threads are instantly live, but moderators can close them.)
 That Sounds
#1596 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2012/04/18 21:32:16
The most reasonable.
 I Agree.
#1597 posted by SleepwalkR [92.231.106.118] on 2012/04/18 22:08:54
#1598 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2012/04/19 05:43:24
Only reason I gave up moderation power was because I couldn't delete all of Shambler's threads and posts, so I agree.
 Okay...
#1599 posted by metlslime [67.188.81.46] on 2012/04/22 01:48:10
moderators have a couple of new powers now.
1. when editing a thread, you can change status between three choices: "normal", "closed", and "censored". Closed threads are still visible to the public but don't accept new posts. Censored threads are completely hidden (but not deleted from the database.)
Our policy should be to censor spam threads (i.e. spambots posting google bait) and to censor duplicate threads (e.g. user posted identical info into two threads by accident, or created both a news and a discission thread because they were uncertain.) If a thread is not spam or dupe, but just misguided (e.g. it should have been posted to mapping help,) then we should post a non-snarky explanation of why, and close it, so they (and others) can learn from their mistake. We shouldn't be deleting title/body of the thread when closing it, because that confuses people, since they won't know which thread it is anymore.
2. When viewing posts, there is now a tiny link next to the byline of each post that says "spam" -- if you click it it will flag it as spam, and then there will be a link that says "unflag" in case you made a mistake. These links us AJAX to update the page without reloading it, it has worked for me for several months but let me know if you find bugs with this feature.
Policy: only flag posts that are really spam, not just because they are annoying.
 ...okay.
#1600 posted by Shambler [86.25.222.132] on 2012/04/22 11:51:09
Makes sense, will use carefully.
 Is My Screen Fucked
#1601 posted by SleepwalkR [85.178.58.45] on 2012/04/22 13:11:32
or did you change the background color?
 Sleepwalkr:
#1602 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2012/04/22 20:17:18
no change to the background, must be something on your end
 Yeah
#1603 posted by SleepwalkR [92.231.225.124] on 2012/04/22 23:41:42
reboot did the trick
 Moderators:
#1604 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2012/05/01 20:07:25
don't forget to change spam threads to "censored" instead of "closed" -- closed threads are still visible.
 That Was Me
#1605 posted by nitin [203.158.35.1] on 2012/05/02 12:47:44
will do it right from now on.
 ლ(ಠ益...
#1606 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2012/05/02 20:43:39
 Aw
#1607 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2012/05/02 20:43:49
ლ(ಠ益...
 Nope
#1608 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2012/05/02 20:44:59
Was trying for this: http://www.blameitonthevoices.com/...
No support for Japanese (?) characters?
Mark the above posts as spam please ;)
 Ijed:
#1609 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2012/05/03 02:01:14
i don't really have a very good system for handling charsets... i think the server is set to Western European or something, the html don't include a charset, there's occasional bugs with weird characters breaking the RSS feed (em dash, copyright symbol, trademark symbol, zertstorer O with the umlaut on it. These don't seem to be causing much of a problem for us so I haven't really investigated what I would need to do to encode everything correctly.
#1610 posted by Spirit [89.204.155.112] on 2012/05/03 07:50:46
you are using htmlspecialcharacters after htmlentities I guess.
 Please...
#1611 posted by Shambler [86.25.165.253] on 2012/05/03 11:38:28
Ban / auto-reject anything from linseo****blog
 +1
#1612 posted by RickyT23 [217.42.134.93] on 2012/05/03 12:25:37
It's really getting to be annoying.
 Yeah
#1613 posted by SleepwalkR [130.149.243.209] on 2012/05/03 14:27:29
I think the time has come, because now they keep spamming the news threads (thus fucking up their order).
 Btw...
#1614 posted by metlslime [67.188.81.46] on 2012/05/03 17:00:14
unflagging ijed's spam posts because there's code that blocks any IP from posting that was once the source of a spam post...
 Status...
#1615 posted by metlslime [67.188.81.46] on 2012/05/04 09:02:50
i'm working on a feature to flag spam accounts, which will help because the current wave of spam is all from registered users (all the linseoblog guys.) I have already flagged the accounts in the database, now i will need to add code to block a new post/thread if it is coming through a spam account. Should be comming soon.
 Cool.
#1616 posted by Shambler [86.25.165.253] on 2012/05/04 09:34:58
That will definitely help as 90% of it seems to be that linseobollox.
 SleepalkR
#1617 posted by negke [31.18.185.232] on 2012/05/04 10:11:07
News and discussion threads in the full lists are ordered by date of creation. Only the "last 10 threads" are affected by (spam) bumping.
 Yeah
#1618 posted by SleepwalkR [130.149.243.224] on 2012/05/04 11:48:56
That's where it annoys me the most, since I never visit the full lists or news page.
 Test
#1619 posted by metlslime [67.188.81.46] on 2012/05/06 08:42:20
this should work
 Okay...
#1620 posted by metlslime [67.188.81.46] on 2012/05/06 09:36:16
accounts flagged as spam accounts are now blocked from creating posts/threads. This is only effective if the spammer is logged in and I have flagged the account. Lineseoblog accounts have all been flagged. Let's see what happens.
 Thanks Metl
#1621 posted by Shambler [86.25.165.253] on 2012/05/06 10:55:44
xxx
 Test
#1622 posted by JPL [82.234.167.238] on 2012/05/06 10:58:10
failed
 I Failed...
#1623 posted by JPL [82.234.167.238] on 2012/05/06 10:59:00
I just tried to replace my name by 'Lineseoblog'.. that does not work :P
sorry...
 Test
#1624 posted by Lineseoblog [82.234.167.238] on 2012/05/06 11:01:08
failed ??
 Eh...
#1625 posted by JPL [82.234.167.238] on 2012/05/06 11:02:24
if not logged he can post: maybe the IP address could be alos flag as spammer... Can it work this way too ?
 Jpl:
#1626 posted by metlslime [67.188.81.46] on 2012/05/06 20:08:52
IP flagging was already a feature.
 Fair Enough...
#1627 posted by JPL [82.234.167.238] on 2012/05/06 20:26:20
:)
 Feature Request
#1628 posted by Spirit [80.171.98.250] on 2012/05/31 22:53:03
Allow "sort by last post" on the archive pages.
#1629 posted by spy [2.72.88.140] on 2012/11/23 05:28:33
How to save to pc these "angry" and "neutral" icons? every time i got an empty files clear.gif
#1630 posted by metlslime [98.237.233.156] on 2012/11/23 10:16:13
Icons are all tiled together into a single image, view source and you'll see it.
 Thanx
#1631 posted by spy [2.132.107.109] on 2012/11/23 17:27:30
i see,
not my way though
#1632 posted by necros [99.227.223.212] on 2012/11/23 20:44:05
metl, I'm assuming you wrote all the php for the board?
 Necros:
#1633 posted by metlslime [98.237.233.156] on 2012/11/23 20:52:51
yeah, it's all custom code i wrote back in 2002 (with some tweaks over the years.)
 This post was flagged as spam.
#1634 posted by a spammer [218.25.59.1] on 2012/12/04 14:34:22
 Sorry Metl
#1635 posted by Spirit [80.171.168.24] on 2012/12/09 14:12:32
Somehow I managed to post with unclosed html tags: http://celephais.net/board/view_th...
Not sure how, the last word is missing the < /i>
#1636 posted by metlslime [24.130.203.37] on 2012/12/09 23:20:48
weird, i thought i fixed this bug for good last time... I'll look into it.
 Nope You Definitely Broke It.
#1637 posted by Shambler [86.25.166.91] on 2012/12/10 00:03:42
 Maybe.
#1638 posted by Shambler [86.25.166.91] on 2012/12/10 00:03:48
 Arse.
#1639 posted by Shambler [86.25.166.91] on 2012/12/10 00:03:55
 Xmas Crate!
#1640 posted by negke [31.18.169.194] on 2012/12/24 09:15:06
 Looks Like
#1641 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2013/02/27 19:41:27
Hitting refresh now causes a double post...
 Looks Like
#1642 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2013/02/27 19:41:32
Hitting refresh now causes a double post...
 Yep
#1643 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2013/02/27 19:41:39
#1644 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/02/28 00:00:51
whoa really?
#1645 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/02/28 00:01:37
doesn't seem to do so on Firefox
 Ah
#1646 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2013/02/28 00:51:11
Chrome then..
 After
#1647 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2013/02/28 00:51:26
Making a post that is.
 Just Checking About The Refresh Thing
#1648 posted by necros [99.227.223.212] on 2013/03/02 21:22:51
on firefox 19
#1649 posted by necros [99.227.223.212] on 2013/03/02 23:50:04
could you make the "All XXXX, Last 25, New XX" bit not get split up by text wrapping?
 Test
#1650 posted by Spirit [80.171.82.5] on 2013/03/04 17:48:38
test
 Yeah, Opera Rocks
#1651 posted by Spirit [80.171.82.5] on 2013/03/04 17:50:32
All the recent double posts make me wonder if some browser stopped warning on resending post data on a refresh.
Opera does not seem to resend at all which of course is desirable.
Let's see:
 Hurr
#1652 posted by chromium [80.171.82.5] on 2013/03/04 17:51:29
durr
#1653 posted by chromium [80.171.82.5] on 2013/03/04 17:51:52
I am a good browser, I prompt.
 Herp
#1654 posted by Firefox 19 [80.171.82.5] on 2013/03/04 17:52:20
derp
#1655 posted by Firefox 19 [80.171.82.5] on 2013/03/04 17:52:59
I behave like Opera, not resending, not prompting.
 And This Concludes Our Scientific Experiment
#1656 posted by Spirit [80.171.82.5] on 2013/03/04 17:54:18
The conclusion is that people are using Internet Explorer 4.0
Weird. Make gamma rays or moon phases?
 Nope
#1657 posted by ijed [200.73.66.2] on 2013/03/04 18:21:21
As I stated before, Chrome.
 ?
#1658 posted by rj [82.9.177.217] on 2013/03/04 19:01:20
!
 ?
#1659 posted by rj [82.9.177.217] on 2013/03/04 19:01:29
!
#1660 posted by rj [82.9.177.217] on 2013/03/04 19:04:56
that was chrome, but it prompted first. don't know why i clicked yes
 Feature Request
#1661 posted by Spirit [80.171.9.227] on 2013/03/05 20:10:35
metl, could you make an anchor in view_thread.php right after the top-most pagination before the first rendered post? And then point to that in "New X" links.
Would save at least 42 milliseconds of scrolling whenever one visits posts with long main posts. ;)
 Test
#1662 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2013/03/14 00:33:17
Test
 Test In Chrome
#1663 posted by metlslime [50.131.113.141] on 2013/03/14 07:58:31
Test in Chrome
#1664 posted by metlslime [50.131.113.141] on 2013/03/14 08:00:53
So Firefox (and every other browser once upon a time) lets you refresh without posting, Chrome offers to resubmit the form. I'm not sure why it offers that, since i use a redirect to help clear out the form data (so that people can refresh the page without worries.) Chrome is just too clever; I guess i'll need to find another way.
#1665 posted by Spirit [80.187.111.27] on 2013/03/14 08:35:08
It's amazing and sad how many people seem to click yes without thinking though. I hope they don't do that for java applets.
 One Common Solution
#1666 posted by SleepwalkR [92.231.224.221] on 2013/03/14 08:35:24
Is to store a magic value in the session and in a hidden form field. On submit, the session value is removed. If the session value is missing, nothing gets posted.
 Missing Or A Mismatch
#1667 posted by SleepwalkR [92.231.224.221] on 2013/03/14 08:35:56
That is.
#1668 posted by RickyT23 [2.216.134.182] on 2013/03/14 08:53:42
Or manually kill the $POST vars after submission maybe.... ?
#1669 posted by Willem [199.255.40.36] on 2013/03/14 20:02:00
It's amazing and sad how many people seem to click yes without thinking though. I hope they don't do that for java applets.
To be fair, that's what happens when too many things ask too many stupid questions. You condition people to click YES out of reflex.
#1670 posted by deqer [68.149.147.30] on 2013/03/15 05:57:13
You may already have tried this, or already have this. But, try putting "exit;" after your header("Location: ") redirect.
 Error No 42
#1671 posted by SleepwalkR [85.178.59.168] on 2013/03/15 07:36:37
Can't post anywhere
 But Here!
#1672 posted by SleepwalkR [85.178.59.168] on 2013/03/15 07:36:49
 Sleepwalkr
#1673 posted by metlslime [50.131.113.141] on 2013/03/15 07:42:47
not sure why it can happen, but this means you loaded the page with one IP address, but when you submitted your post you had a different IP.
Maybe it happens on mobile phones more because they can change networks frequently? (edge <-> 3g <-> wifi)
 Okay
#1674 posted by SleepwalkR [85.178.59.168] on 2013/03/15 07:55:25
I understand. I'm at home where I'm in my wifi, but sometimes it switches to mobile broadband for some reason. Thanks!
 Deqer:
#1675 posted by metlslime [50.131.113.141] on 2013/03/15 08:09:49
i can see how that might help, as my php still generates the entire page after you post.
I wonder if chrome is ignoring the redirect because it's the same URL? In that case i could use a second URL as the post target and then redirect back to view_thread.php.
 Good Guess
#1676 posted by mwh [86.166.230.248] on 2013/03/19 08:54:12
Seems it's a chrome bug: https://code.google.com/p/chromium...
Will be fixed soon judging by my skim of that report.
 Ah Good...
#1677 posted by metlslime [50.131.113.141] on 2013/03/19 09:15:19
i'll just do nothing then :)
(though adding an "exit" to my php after the redirect still sounds like a good idea to save server resources)
#1678 posted by deqer [68.149.147.30] on 2013/03/19 09:33:24
Although it's a bug and that it's being addressed, it's still too late.
Not many people will bother to upgrade their Chrome to latest version--we've seen that habit with IE users.
Simply adding several lines of javascript, and you'll be able to convert your "Post A Reply" < form > to use Ajax.
By looking at your HTML code, I can see that you are using javascript without any libraries such as mootools, jquery, etc. -- which is fine, you can still do ajax with plain javascript.
---
Just adjust your HTML slightly by adding an ID to the <td> that holds the "Post A Reply" form html.
Currently it is:
< td bgcolor="#333333" width="500" valign="top" >
< span class="header2">Post A Reply:</span >
...
< /td >
Change the < td > to have id="post-a-reply"
So, you then have < td bgcolor="#333333" width="500" valign="top" id="post-a-reply" >
Then, the javascript would be:
On submit:
var xmlhttp;
if (window.XMLHttpRequest) { // code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari
xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest();
}
else { // code for IE6, IE5
xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLH...
}
xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = function() {
if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) {
document.getElementById("post... = xmlhttp.responseText;
}
}
xmlhttp.open("POST",&quo...
xmlhttp.send();
---
Notice I added another parameter "&ajax=1" to the submit URL, and you can use that in PHP to spit out a specific response for the update to the < td >, rather spit the entire page as if there was no ajax.
Obviously the "id=2&start=1676" part is dynamic, of course.
#1679 posted by deqer [68.149.147.30] on 2013/03/19 09:35:04
Hmm, that one line got garbled. It changed my quotation character to "&quo..." Let's try again:
xmlhttp.open("POST", "http://celephais.net/board/v... ,true);
Ahhh, whatever.
#1680 posted by Spirit [80.187.110.75] on 2013/03/19 10:09:28
Chrome updates automatically.
 Yup
#1681 posted by SleepwalkR [80.187.106.33] on 2013/03/19 10:44:11
Deqer, this is a veey change-averse group ;-)
#1682 posted by deqer [68.149.147.30] on 2013/03/19 16:45:14
Still doesn't hurt to add some ajax to the site. Ajax has been available and supported for 10+ years now. Saves on resources, too.
It's 2013. Get with it.
 Metl
#1683 posted by Spirit [85.176.219.70] on 2013/03/19 16:49:14
Please don't. Javascript is bloody annoying.
 Yes
#1684 posted by SleepwalkR [130.149.243.224] on 2013/03/19 17:51:22
Please don't, and it's not necessary at all. You can protect against double posts entirely on the server.
#1685 posted by rj [82.9.177.217] on 2013/03/19 18:50:56
Please don't. Javascript is bloody annoying.
uhm.. javascript is used already?
#1686 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2013/03/19 19:28:03
I do have plans for ajax, in fact it's already used for the "flag spam" feature that moderators have. But this site is not my active project right now (aside from necessary maintenance.)And don't worry, I would only use it for enhancements that make sense for the design of the site.
#1687 posted by deqer [68.149.147.30] on 2013/03/19 20:03:37
Yeah, better not let a stranger like me tell you how to improve your outdated website. Best you figure it out on your own. Maybe another 10 years, and you'll come around.
 Yo Deqer
#1688 posted by Spirit [80.187.103.136] on 2013/03/19 20:07:59
if you are not listening to the many people who give you helpful advice, then why should they listen to you.
#1689 posted by Willem [108.228.244.211] on 2013/03/20 00:09:42
He's gone critical! He's gonna blow!
I knew it wouldn't last. Awesome.
 Deqer
#1690 posted by RickyT23 [86.162.147.2] on 2013/03/20 14:29:51
Welcome to the OLD SKOOL!!!
 Also Deqer
#1691 posted by RickyT23 [86.162.147.2] on 2013/03/20 14:32:42
Thanks for the lesson in AJAX btw. Seriously. That looks like useful info for a cat like me (deadly serious), please re-post the truncated line again, just add a space after .celephais.net/board .
 And
#1692 posted by RickyT23 [86.162.147.2] on 2013/03/20 14:33:36
ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLH...
 Actually
#1693 posted by Kinn [81.156.206.151] on 2013/03/20 16:08:13
If you could use some fancy javascript/ajax/jibberty-jello magic to make it so Deqer's posts are ignored that would be great thanks :)
#1694 posted by Willem [199.255.40.36] on 2013/03/20 17:50:54
Or just install vBulletin.
*ducks*
 So I Heard U Likes JQuery?
#1695 posted by Spiney [81.241.139.66] on 2013/03/25 16:11:34
 Feature Suggestion
#1696 posted by negke [31.18.177.112] on 2013/03/25 19:01:52
A link to display all posts from within a thread. I know it can be done by clicking on the title, but it's not very transparent and, well, I keep forgetting. Would fit well with the current navigation: All | First | Previous | Next | Last.
 Don't Go
#1697 posted by ijed [186.37.203.156] on 2013/03/26 02:58:21
For the crown Kinn.
#1698 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/03/27 01:28:05
test test
#1699 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/03/27 01:28:06
test test
#1700 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/03/27 01:29:01
repro on double posting in Firefox:
Write post.
Press Preview.
Hit submit rapidly on the preview page.
 Random Request: OpenID?
#1701 posted by Tyrann [203.122.220.108] on 2013/04/04 10:20:29
@metlslime: how hard do you think it might be to make func an OpenID provider, so that we could use our func_msgboard accounts to log into other sites? Then people could use their func personas to post comments on my site (instead of creating a local login) or possibly quakewiki.org could hook into it as well?
 Tyrann:
#1702 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2013/04/04 21:26:58
I don't know, I actually have never looked into it.
#1703 posted by necros [142.245.193.10] on 2013/04/12 22:28:55
ERROR: Error message number 42
when i tried to submit a post?
 Your IP Number Changed
#1704 posted by SleepwalkR [92.231.108.8] on 2013/04/13 00:01:06
Usually happens on smartphones when they switch from Wifi to Cellular or vice versa.
#1705 posted by necros [99.227.223.212] on 2013/04/13 01:11:13
ah ok, i was at work. :)
if it's caused by that, shouldn't the error just say that instead? error 42 is very cryptic.
 It's The Answer!
#1706 posted by Spirit [80.171.1.255] on 2013/04/13 01:23:36
 It's A Nerd Thing
#1707 posted by SleepwalkR [92.231.108.8] on 2013/04/13 07:16:55
from Hitchhiker's Guide.
 It's Broken Again! :p
#1708 posted by The Happy Friar [184.9.8.205] on 2013/04/20 22:45:50
Looks like the Lvl post broke the RSS feed. :D
 Agh,,,
#1709 posted by metlslime [50.131.113.141] on 2013/04/21 08:47:38
looks like the accented characters did it again:
* Under Water by T-kölök
I probably need to escape these chars or use the correct Character encoding in the xml or something.
 I Used
#1710 posted by RickyT23 [86.160.144.189] on 2013/04/23 10:59:43
utf8_encode($foo);
Im my PHP CMS.
 Dearest Mods
#1711 posted by Scampie2 [188.165.201.86] on 2013/05/10 18:30:22
http://www.celephais.net/board/vie...
Please unflag that post, I believe it banned my ip from posting (posting from anonymouse.org)
 At Least
#1712 posted by Scampie2 [188.165.201.86] on 2013/05/10 18:35:17
I am assuming that is why I keep getting 'Error 71' every time I attempt to post, logged in or not, and why I CAN post from a proxy.
#1713 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2013/05/10 18:43:15
Unflagged.
I can't remember for sure but i think if a registered account is associated with a flagged post, it blocks that account from posting.
 Or..
#1714 posted by metlslime [159.153.4.50] on 2013/05/10 18:44:03
maybe it is IP-based. Can't remember and i don't have the source code in front of me right now.
 Test Test
#1715 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/05/10 19:07:05
thanks
 Btw Metl
#1716 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/05/10 19:10:38
I emailed you last night regarding this since I hadn't thought of anonymous proxy browsing to post, and hadn't thought that SOMEONEbler may have flagged one of my posts. So you can ignore that email (assuming the washington.edu email you have posted all over the site is still valid for you)
 Please Reban Him
#1717 posted by SleepwalkR [85.178.62.170] on 2013/05/10 19:49:33
That's all.
 :_(
#1718 posted by Scampie [72.12.65.92] on 2013/05/10 19:50:45
 Lol
#1719 posted by mfx [78.55.196.109] on 2013/05/21 03:55:25
!
|